Used and loved by millions

Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak quote

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak

CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com

MitStanfordHarvardAustralian Nationa UniversityNanyangOxford

Was recognized for

Grammar usage guide and real-world examples

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "Was recognized for" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used to indicate that someone received acknowledgment or praise for a specific achievement or contribution. Example: "She was recognized for her outstanding contributions to the community during the annual awards ceremony."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Academia

Encyclopedias

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

Dr. Walker was recognized for obtaining financial support for dance.

News & Media

The New York Times

He was recognized for 35 years of service by NYU.

News & Media

The New York Times

She was recognized for her work in youth hockey.

Williams was recognized for his brilliance even as an undergraduate.

Encyclopedias

Britannica

He was recognized for his writings on race and identity.

The book was recognized for melding scholarship and engaging prose.

News & Media

The New York Times

On the bus to prison, he was recognized for being one thing: a notorious child molester.

Shirley was recognized for her significant community accomplish ments by the Governor in 2001.

News & Media

The New York Times

Mr. Dietrich was recognized for the quality and breadth of his collecting interests.

"He was recognized for forming a successful partnership with John Niblack".

News & Media

The New York Times

He was recognized for his actions during combat operations in Amfreville, France, on June 9 , 1944

Show more...

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "Was recognized for", ensure the reason for recognition is clearly stated to provide context and impact.

Common error

Avoid overusing passive voice constructions like "Was recognized for" throughout your writing. Vary sentence structure to maintain reader engagement and clarity.

Antonio Rotolo, PhD - Digital Humanist | Computational Linguist | CEO @Ludwig.guru

Antonio Rotolo, PhD

Digital Humanist | Computational Linguist | CEO @Ludwig.guru

Source & Trust

87%

Authority and reliability

4.5/5

Expert rating

Real-world application tested

Linguistic Context

The phrase "Was recognized for" functions as a passive construction used to indicate that someone or something received acknowledgment, praise, or a formal distinction for a particular accomplishment or quality. Ludwig provides several examples demonstrating its usage in various contexts.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

News & Media

38%

Academia

38%

Encyclopedias

9%

Less common in

Wiki

2%

Science

2%

Formal & Business

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, "Was recognized for" is a common and grammatically sound phrase used to denote that someone or something received acknowledgment or praise for a specific achievement or attribute. Ludwig AI confirms its correctness and provides numerous examples across news, academic, and encyclopedia sources. Alternative phrases include "was honored for" and "was acknowledged for". When using this phrase, ensure clarity regarding the reason for recognition and be mindful of varying sentence structure to avoid overuse of passive voice. This phrase is generally suitable for neutral to professional contexts, emphasizing the value of the recognized attribute.

FAQs

How to use "Was recognized for" in a sentence?

Use "Was recognized for" to indicate that someone or something received acknowledgment or praise for a specific achievement. For example: "She "was recognized for" her contributions to the community."

What can I say instead of "Was recognized for"?

You can use alternatives like "was honored for", "was acknowledged for", or "received recognition for depending on the context.

Which is correct, "Was recognized for" or "Is recognized for"?

"Was recognized for" is used for past events, while "Is recognized for" is for present or ongoing recognition. For example, "He "was recognized for" his past achievements, and now he "is recognized for" his ongoing efforts."

What's the difference between "Was recognized for" and "Became known for"?

"Was recognized for" implies a specific event or achievement that led to recognition, while "became known for" suggests a gradual development of reputation or expertise over time.

ChatGPT power + Grammarly precisionChatGPT power + Grammarly precision
ChatGPT + Grammarly

Editing plus AI, all in one place.

Stop switching between tools. Your AI writing partner for everything—polishing proposals, crafting emails, finding the right tone.

Source & Trust

87%

Authority and reliability

4.5/5

Expert rating

Real-world application tested

Most frequent sentences: