Was honored for

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "Was honored for" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used to indicate that someone received recognition or an award for a specific achievement or contribution. Example: "She was honored for her outstanding contributions to the community during the annual awards ceremony."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Academia

Science

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

For doing what Brutus was honored for".

The New York Times - Arts

For doing what Brutus was honored for...

The Washington Post

Ms. Philp was honored for leadership.

The New York Times

(He did and was honored for his valor).

The New York Times - Arts

Andrew Lloyd Webber was honored for lifetime achievement.

The New York Times

Mary D. Lindsay, the founder, was honored for lifetime achievement.

The New York Times

She was honored for her lifetime support of the arts and architecture.

The New York Times

The violinist Hae-Young Ham was honored for her 25th anniversary.

The New York Times - Arts

ALEXIS BITTAR, left, who was honored for his jewelry, and TOM SHARP.

The New York Times

The tap choreographer Michelle Dorrance was honored for stretching the boundaries of a traditional form.

The New York Times - Arts

A fourth scientist was honored for decades of work in biomedical sciences.

The New York Times - Health

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

Use "was honored for" to highlight positive achievements and contributions, adding prestige to the subject being discussed.

Common error

Avoid using "was honored for" without specifying the exact achievement or contribution. For example, instead of saying "She was honored for her work", specify "She was honored for her work in advancing women's rights".

Linguistic Context

The phrase "was honored for" serves to indicate that an individual or entity received recognition or an award for a specific accomplishment or contribution. It is commonly used to highlight positive achievements, as confirmed by Ludwig.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

News & Media

39%

Academia

28%

Science

10%

Less common in

Wiki

5%

Formal & Business

3%

Reference

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, "was honored for" is a versatile phrase used to denote recognition or an award received for a specific achievement. Ludwig AI confirms its grammatical correctness and frequent usage across various contexts, including News & Media and Academia. When using the phrase, clarity and specificity are key to highlighting the significance of the honor. Alternatives include "was recognized for" and "received an award for".

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

Was recognized for

Highlights the act of being formally acknowledged for something.

Received an award for

Focuses specifically on receiving a formal award as recognition.

Was commended for

Implies official praise or formal approval for notable actions.

Was presented with an honor for

Conveys receiving an official acknowledgement for achievement.

Was celebrated for

Emphasizes a joyous acknowledgement or commemoration of achievement.

Was distinguished for

Signifies that someone was recognized for preeminence and excellence.

Was acclaimed for

Indicates widespread praise and recognition, especially publicly.

Was lauded for

Emphasizes strong public praise.

Was given tribute for

Suggests that one was recognized for extraordinary achievement.

Was decorated for

Specifically relates to receiving a decoration of merit.

FAQs

How can I use "was honored for" in a sentence?

Use "was honored for" to show that someone has received recognition for a specific achievement or contribution. For example, "The scientist "was honored for" her groundbreaking research in genetics".

What are some alternatives to "was honored for"?

Alternatives include "was recognized for", "received an award for", or "was celebrated for".

Is it correct to say "was honored by" instead of "was honored for"?

While both can be correct, "was honored for" typically specifies the reason or achievement for which someone was honored, whereas "was honored by" indicates who gave the honor. For example, "She was honored for her service" vs. "She was honored by the organization".

Can "was honored for" be used in both formal and informal contexts?

"Was honored for" is suitable for both formal and informal writing, though it is more common in formal contexts like news reports, academic papers, and professional communications.