Stripped of

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "Stripped of" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used to indicate that something has been removed or taken away from someone or something, often referring to essential qualities or attributes. Example: "The novel was stripped of its original context, leaving readers confused about the characters' motivations."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Encyclopedias

Science

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

Stripped of hair.

The Guardian - Lifestyle

Stripped of his plundered fortune, he died ignominiously in jail.

Encyclopedia Britannica

Stripped of her voice.

Huffington Post

Stripped of his rank by Democrats.

Huffington Post

History stripped of distinctions.

The New York Times - Arts

He was subsequently stripped of the title.

The New York Times - Sports

Armstrong was stripped of those titles.

Encyclopedia Britannica

Could they be stripped of their peerages?

Independent

He was stripped of his Tour wins.

The Economist

Each were stripped of their medals.

The New York Times - Sports

Bagai was stripped of his status.

The New Yorker

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

Use "stripped of" to convey a sense of forceful removal or deprivation. It often implies a loss of something essential or valued.

Common error

Avoid using "stripped of" when a more neutral term like "removed from" would be more appropriate. "Stripped of" carries a stronger emotional charge and suggests a significant loss.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "stripped of" functions as a prepositional phrase, often modifying a verb to indicate the removal or deprivation of something from a subject. As Ludwig AI confirms, it’s a common and grammatically correct construct.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

News & Media

52%

Encyclopedias

21%

Science

15%

Less common in

Formal & Business

6%

Wiki

4%

Reference

2%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, "stripped of" is a versatile prepositional phrase used to express the forceful removal or deprivation of something, carrying a generally neutral to slightly negative connotation. As Ludwig AI's analysis indicates, it is grammatically correct and frequently used, particularly in news, encyclopedic, and scientific contexts. While alternatives like "deprived of" or "divested of" exist, "stripped of" often provides a more impactful and direct way to convey loss or removal.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

Deprived of

A direct synonym, emphasizing the act of taking something away.

Divested of

Implies a more formal or legal removal of something.

Dispossessed of

Specifically refers to the loss of property or land.

Relieved of

Suggests a removal that might be welcomed or a burden lifted.

Bereft of

Emphasizes a sense of loss and sorrow due to the removal.

Unburdened of

Highlights the removal of a weight or responsibility.

Cleared of

Indicates removal of blame or suspicion.

Emptied of

Focuses on the physical removal of contents.

Exempted from

Indicates being freed from an obligation or duty.

Defrocked of

Used exclusively in the context of clergy losing their position.

FAQs

What does "stripped of" mean?

The phrase "stripped of" means that something has been taken away from someone or something, often referring to essential qualities, possessions, or attributes. It implies a forceful or significant removal.

What can I say instead of "stripped of"?

You can use alternatives like "deprived of", "divested of", or "relieved of" depending on the context.

How to use "stripped of" in a sentence?

For example: "He was stripped of his title after the scandal."

What's the difference between "stripped of" and "removed from"?

"Stripped of" often implies a more forceful or significant removal with negative connotations, while "removed from" is generally more neutral.