No subjects

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "No subjects" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used in contexts where you want to indicate that there are no topics, themes, or individuals being discussed or considered. Example: "In this experiment, we found that there were no subjects available for participation."

✓ Grammatically correct

Science

News & Media

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

59 human-written examples

No subjects experienced injuries between BL and 2-year FU.

Journal of Experimental Orthopaedics

No subjects required extended hospitalisation or additional medical management.

Insights into Imaging

No subjects were excluded.

Plosone

No subjects were excluded from the study.

Plosone

No subjects smoked during the 1 hr pre-MRI training.

Plosone

No subjects were on medication, including hormonal contraceptives.

Plosone

No subjects were allowed to participate more than once.

Plosone

No subjects were consistently negative for this gene.

Plosone

No subjects met criteria for substance abuse or dependence.

Plosone

No subjects had any history of mental disorder.

Plosone

No subjects had any lifetime histories of substance dependence.

Plosone

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "No subjects" in research writing, ensure that the context clearly specifies what type of subjects are being referred to (e.g., "No subjects were excluded based on age").

Common error

Avoid using "No subjects" when you intend to convey that the topic is absent. "No subjects" indicates the absence of participants or individuals under study, not the lack of a theme or topic.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "No subjects" functions primarily as a determiner phrase indicating the absence of individuals or entities under consideration. It is commonly used in research reports, scientific papers, and general discourse to specify that no participants or topics meet specific criteria. According to Ludwig AI, the phrase is correct and usable in written English.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

Science

84%

News & Media

7%

Formal & Business

3%

Less common in

Encyclopedias

2%

Wiki

2%

Reference

2%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, the phrase "No subjects" is a grammatically sound and frequently used expression, primarily within scientific and formal contexts. It is used to clearly indicate the absence of individuals or entities meeting specific criteria in studies or discussions. While "No subjects" is often found in scientific literature, according to Ludwig AI the phrase is correct and usable in written English. When using this phrase, ensure clarity about the type of subjects being referenced and avoid misinterpreting it as the absence of a topic. Alternatives like "no participants" or "zero participants" can provide subtle variations in meaning while maintaining grammatical correctness.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

Zero participants

Replaces "subjects" with "participants", emphasizing individuals involved in a study.

No participants

Focuses on the absence of individuals taking part in a study or experiment.

No cases

Highlights the absence of specific instances or occurrences relevant to a particular situation.

None involved

Emphasizes that there were no individuals or entities connected to a certain event or situation.

Without participants

Highlights the state of lacking individuals involved in a study or experiment.

No individuals

Replaces "subjects" with the more general term "individuals".

No entities

Indicates the absence of specific bodies or things relevant to a situation.

The subject is absent

Shifts the focus to the absence of the topic itself rather than individuals.

The topic is nonexistent

Emphasizes the non-existence of the subject matter being discussed.

There are no matters

Highlights the lack of specific issues or topics to address.

FAQs

How do I use "No subjects" in a sentence?

Use "No subjects" to indicate that there are no participants in a study or that no individuals meet certain criteria. For example, "No subjects were excluded from the study" or "No subjects reported adverse effects".

What can I say instead of "No subjects"?

You can use alternatives such as "no participants", "zero participants", or "none involved" depending on the specific context.

Is it grammatically correct to say "No subjects were"?

Yes, "No subjects were" is grammatically correct. "Subjects" is plural, so it requires the plural verb form "were".

When should I use "no patients" instead of "No subjects"?

Use "no patients" when referring specifically to individuals receiving medical care. "No subjects" is a more general term that can apply to any participants in a study, regardless of their health status.