Met with

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "Met with" is correct and usable in written English.
It is typically used to indicate that someone has had a meeting or encounter with another person or group. Example: "Yesterday, I met with the project team to discuss our progress and next steps."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Encyclopedias

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

Met with De Klerk.

Los Angeles Times

"Met with the Russians?

Los Angeles Times

Kroll met with Marsh.

The New Yorker

I met with people.

The New Yorker

I met with her.

The New York Times

Harroun eventually met with him.

The New Yorker

They have met with resistance.

Independent

Adversity is met with stoicism.

The Economist

They met with failure, too.

The New York Times - Sports

"I was met with giggles.

The New York Times

These met with limited opposition.

The Economist

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "Met with", ensure the context clearly indicates the purpose and outcome of the meeting for better clarity.

Common error

Avoid using "Meet to" instead of "Meet with" when describing an arranged encounter or discussion.

Linguistic Context

The primary grammatical function of "Met with" is to act as a verb phrase, indicating an action of encountering or holding a meeting. Ludwig AI shows examples of its usage across various contexts.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

News & Media

60%

Encyclopedias

13%

Wiki

8%

Less common in

Formal & Business

3%

Science

3%

Reference

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

The phrase "Met with" is a commonly used verb phrase that indicates a planned or arranged encounter, typically for discussion. As Ludwig AI confirms, the phrase is grammatically correct and is observed frequently in "News & Media" sources and Encyclopedias. To ensure clarity in writing, it's essential to specify the purpose and outcomes of the meeting. While alternatives like "Had an encounter with" or "Held discussions with" exist, "Met with" maintains a neutral and widely accepted register.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

Had an encounter with

Emphasizes a brief or unplanned meeting.

Held discussions with

Highlights the exchange of ideas and information.

Conducted a meeting with

Suggests a formal and organized encounter.

Came into contact with

Indicates any form of interaction, not necessarily a meeting.

Was introduced to

Implies a first-time meeting or acquaintance.

Connected with

Focuses on establishing a relationship or rapport.

Negotiated with

Highlights discussions aimed at reaching an agreement.

Interviewed

Specifically refers to a formal questioning session.

Collaborated with

Emphasizes working together on a project or task.

Consulted with

Suggests seeking advice or expertise from someone.

FAQs

How can I use "Met with" in a sentence?

"Met with" is used to describe an encounter or a meeting. For example, "I "met with" the manager to discuss the project".

What's a more formal way to say "Met with"?

More formal alternatives include "Held discussions with", "Conducted a meeting with", or "Consulted with".

Is it correct to say "Meet to discuss" instead of "Met with"?

While "meet to discuss" is grammatically correct, ""met with"" is more commonly used when referring to a specific meeting that occurred.

What is the difference between "Met with" and "Encountered"?

"Met with" implies a planned meeting, while "encountered" suggests a more accidental or unplanned meeting or interaction.