Used and loved by millions
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com
I did not include
Grammar usage guide and real-world examplesUSAGE SUMMARY
The phrase "I did not include" is correct and usable in written English.
You can use it when you want to indicate that something was intentionally left out or omitted from a document, discussion, or list. Example: "In my report, I did not include the financial projections as they were not finalized."
✓ Grammatically correct
News & Media
Science
Academia
Alternative expressions(6)
Table of contents
Usage summary
Human-verified examples
Expert writing tips
Linguistic context
Ludwig's wrap-up
Alternative expressions
FAQs
Human-verified examples from authoritative sources
Exact Expressions
54 human-written examples
Moreover, Kapiriri et al. evaluated priority setting in Uganda and found that the BOD/CEA approach: i) did not include other values that were important to Ugandans (e.g. protecting the vulnerable); ii) was too opaque; iii) did not involve relevant people, and iv) was too technical, requiring expertise that was unavailable[ 12].
Science
As a result, I did not include it in my final implementation.
Academia
(I did not include searches that included the word "nigga" because these searches were mostly for rap lyrics).
News & Media
I did not include predecessors like Patsy's, Grimaldi's or Di Fara because they're products of less self-conscious pizza times.
News & Media
I did not include it in the main body of the chapter because, well, it has nothing to do with domestication.
News & Media
I included this tale in my profile, but I did not include what Lee told me about his further motivation for writing the Times op-ed.
News & Media
Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources
Similar Expressions
6 human-written examples
If f i does not include the base k in the sequence read (within the gap of a paired-read, for instance), then '–'.
Science
Hey look, I didn't include Philadelphia!
News & Media
But I didn't include what happened next.
News & Media
What I didn't include was something else Schakowsky said.
News & Media
Chargers to win Hey look, I didn't include Philadelphia!
News & Media
Expert writing Tips
Best practice
Use "I did not include" when you want to clearly state that something was intentionally left out, often to provide context or explanation for its absence.
Common error
Avoid using "I did not include" without explaining why the exclusion is relevant. Always provide a reason or justification to avoid confusion or raise unnecessary questions.
Source & Trust
84%
Authority and reliability
4.5/5
Expert rating
Real-world application tested
Linguistic Context
The phrase "I did not include" functions as a declarative statement indicating the omission of something. As Ludwig AI suggests, it is generally grammatically correct and usable in written English. It directly expresses the speaker's action of excluding something from a set or consideration.
Frequent in
News & Media
70%
Science
20%
Academia
10%
Less common in
Formal & Business
0%
Encyclopedias
0%
Reference
0%
Ludwig's WRAP-UP
In summary, the phrase "I did not include" is a grammatically correct and commonly used expression to indicate the omission of something. As Ludwig AI confirms, it is suitable for various contexts, primarily in news, science, and academic writing. When using this phrase, it's best practice to provide context for the exclusion to ensure clarity. Alternatives include "I excluded" or "I omitted" for a more formal tone, and "I left out" for informal communication. Remember to always explain why something was excluded to avoid confusion.
More alternative expressions(10)
Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:
I excluded
Replaces "did not include" with a single verb, making the sentence more concise.
I omitted
Similar to "excluded", this offers a more formal synonym for "did not include".
I left out
An informal alternative that conveys the same meaning.
I didn't add
Focuses on the action of not adding something to a list or collection.
I didn't mention
Specifically indicates that something was not mentioned in speech or writing.
I failed to include
Highlights an oversight or unintentional exclusion.
I refrained from including
Suggests a deliberate decision to avoid including something.
I avoided including
Indicates an effort to prevent something from being included.
It was not included by me
Passive voice construction emphasizing the exclusion.
I purposefully excluded
Emphasizes a conscious decision to exclude something.
FAQs
How can I rephrase "I did not include" to sound more formal?
For a more formal tone, consider using alternatives such as "I excluded" or "I omitted". These options are more concise and suitable for professional or academic writing.
What's a more casual way to say "I did not include"?
In informal contexts, you can use phrases like "I left out" or "I didn't add". These options are more conversational and suitable for everyday communication.
When is it appropriate to use "I did not include" in writing?
Use "I did not include" when you want to clearly state that something was intentionally left out, often to provide context or explanation for its absence. For example, "I did not include the financial projections in this report because they are still preliminary."
Is there a difference between "I did not include" and "I failed to include"?
"I did not include" suggests a conscious decision to leave something out, while "I failed to include" implies an oversight or unintentional omission. The choice depends on whether the exclusion was intentional or not.
Editing plus AI, all in one place.
Stop switching between tools. Your AI writing partner for everything—polishing proposals, crafting emails, finding the right tone.
Table of contents
Usage summary
Human-verified examples
Expert writing tips
Linguistic context
Ludwig's wrap-up
Alternative expressions
FAQs
Source & Trust
84%
Authority and reliability
4.5/5
Expert rating
Real-world application tested