A reviewed version

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "A reviewed version" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used when referring to a document or text that has been examined and possibly edited for accuracy or quality. Example: "Please submit a reviewed version of your report by the end of the week."

✓ Grammatically correct

Science

News & Media

Academia

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

1 human-written examples

The patients' comments were taken into consideration by the expert panel and integrated when drafting a reviewed version of the questionnaire.

Health and Quality of Life Outcomes

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

59 human-written examples

As part of the ongoing development of the ICF conceptual model, the World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule 2.0 (WHODAS-2) was created in 1998 (as a substantially reviewed version of the WHO-DAS[ 8]) to assess disability based on the ICF model[ 9].

Health and Quality of Life Outcomes

A backward translation of the reviewed version was then translated into Dutch, to verify that the meaning of each item of the scale was preserved.

Environmental Health: A Global Access Science Source

This is the pre-peer reviewed version of an article with the same title to be published in final form at the Journal of the European Financial Management Association.

Stanford University

We indexed every DER file based on a file name convention that consisted of the pesticide chemical (PC) code, study identification number (MRID), study type identification number [based on 870 series OPPTS harmonized health effect guidelines (U.S. EPA 1996)], species code, review identification number (TXR), and a review version code.

Environmental Health Perspectives

He offered his views in a lecture on "Value Theory and Ethics" in 1924/25 and then again in a reviewed and expanded version in 1926/27.

SEP

A catalog release view is a carefully reviewed, static version of the CSC.

Harvard University

"There is not a scientific reason to lump those two together," Dr. John R. Balmes, a professor of environmental health and medicine at the University of California, San Francisco, who reviewed a version of the report before it was published, said in a recent interview.

The New York Times

This is a pre-peer review version of a paper that argues for asset allocation policies that adapt as the relative market values of major asset classes change.

Stanford University

"It's... practically guaranteed to put a smile on the face of all but the most determined grouch," Lawrence Van Gelder said in The New York Times when he reviewed a version of the show at New York Theater Workshop in 1998.

The New York Times - Arts

We would thus be willing to review a revised version that met the following criteria: 1) Analysis at full resolution.

eLife

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When referring to a document or text, specify the type of review it underwent (e.g., "a peer-reviewed version", "a patient-reviewed version") to provide more context.

Common error

Avoid simply stating "a reviewed version" without clarifying who conducted the review or what criteria were used. Provide specific information to enhance clarity and credibility.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "A reviewed version" functions as a noun phrase, where "reviewed" acts as an adjective modifying "version". According to Ludwig AI, it indicates a specific iteration of something (like a document or software) that has undergone examination and potential revision.

Expression frequency: Rare

Frequent in

Science

41%

News & Media

32%

Academia

27%

Less common in

Formal & Business

0%

Encyclopedias

0%

Wiki

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, "A reviewed version" is a grammatically correct phrase used to denote a version of something that has undergone examination and potential revision. As Ludwig AI confirms, this phrase is typically used in neutral to formal contexts, particularly in science, news, media and academic settings. When using this phrase, consider specifying the type of review or who conducted it to provide greater clarity. Related phrases include "a revised edition" and "an edited copy". Although relatively rare, the phrase is easily understood and adds a level of credibility to the version being discussed.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

A revised edition

Emphasizes the updated nature of the version after changes have been made.

An edited copy

Highlights the process of editing and refining the content.

A vetted form

Stresses the thorough examination and approval of the version.

A checked draft

Indicates that the draft has undergone a verification process.

A proofread copy

Focuses on the correction of errors in the version.

A finalized form

Highlights that the version has reached its final stage after review.

A polished version

Emphasizes the refined and improved quality of the version.

A carefully examined version

Highlights the thoroughness of the review process.

An inspected copy

Focuses on the inspection and assessment of the version.

A validated version

Indicates that the version has been confirmed as accurate and reliable.

FAQs

How can I use "a reviewed version" in a sentence?

You can use "a reviewed version" to indicate that a document or piece of work has been examined and corrected, for example, "Please submit "a reviewed version" of the manuscript by Friday".

What's the difference between "a reviewed version" and "a revised version"?

"A reviewed version" implies that something has been checked for accuracy and quality, while "a revised version" suggests that changes and improvements have been made.

What can I say instead of "a reviewed version"?

Alternatives include "an edited copy", "a revised edition", or "a vetted form", depending on the context.

Is it necessary to specify who did the reviewing for "a reviewed version"?

While not always necessary, specifying who performed the review (e.g., "a peer-reviewed version", "an expert-reviewed version") adds credibility and context.