Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(5)
Exact(8)
And, just as importantly, what's your justification for that pick?
I strongly disagree with your justification for publishing the May 31 article that included so many operational details.
But where would your justification for (3) come from?
As you deduce Q5 from P5, your justification for P5 based on E5 transfers to Q5.
For your justification for P4 transmitted to Q4 is intuitively quantitatively stronger than your initial justification for Q4.
As long as your justification for (H) is owed solely to (E) and (M), neither of which includes any beliefs, DB tells us that (H) is basic.
Similar(52)
Look at all your justifications for why you are stuck as excuses.
Forgiving demands that you give up your justifications for holding on to anger.
According to the compromise position, your having justification for (H) depends on your having justification for believing something else in addition to (H), namely that your visual experiences are reliable.
Likewise, your having justification for attributing reliability to your perceptual experiences doesn't entail that you have given thought to the matter and actually formed the belief that they are reliable.
Given your antecedent justification for believing Q, you are justified in trusting your own counting and so you acquire a justification for P that intuitively transmits to Q, thereby strengthening your antecedent testimony-based justification for it.
More suggestions(2)
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com