"What will win are your judgments.
In any case, whatever your judgments may be, keep them to yourself.
They can say: 'Britain doesn't accept your judgments; why should we?'" Part of Britain's attitude can be explained simply by a different conception of the law.
It is a well-established finding in psychology that believing you are an objective judge actually makes your judgments less objective, and I'm sure philosophy suffers from this.
"You have to let your judgments speak for themselves … Sometimes you would like to make yourself heard but you have to resist the temptation".
Your judgments about the merits of a particular program of health insurance are not the place of an economist or a government.
"You can have a moral judgment," Thompson says, "but you have to ask, 'Does your character judge himself?' If he doesn't, you can't, otherwise you play what your judgments are".
"You can have a moral judgment," he says, "but you have to ask, 'Does your character judge himself?' If he doesn't, you can't, otherwise you play what your judgments are".
The more your judgments have to be made in a trice and beamed round the globe, the more you're in competition with the giant, hugely resourced financial agencies, who can develop superb analysis and reporting of their own.
Your judgments are questioned, players and coaches scream at you, fans think the worst of you, sports radio hosts fillet you, and know-it-all broadcasters foment negativity with misguided opinions.
