Sentence examples for your credence from inspiring English sources

Your credence that it will lands heads is 0.7 and your credence that it will land tails is 0.6.

Thus, Evidential Dominance does not entail that your credence function is irrational.

Suspending judgement is something you do when the evidence doesn't determine your credence.

Let \(c^*\) be your credence function: that is, it assigns 0.7 to Heads and 0.6 to Tails.

Then, we might say, the fact that your credence function is accuracy dominated does not rule it irrational.

And suppose that none of the credence functions that accuracy dominate your credence function have that feature.

The general idea is that you should set your credences to what you expect your credences to be in the future.

After all, it is dominated only by credence functions that violate the constraints that your evidence imposes on your credences.

Your credences just are that function that represents you as a rational agent.

Often your credences will be precise enough, and your available actions will be such that you act more or less as if you were a strict Bayesian.

If your credences serve as your standard for the acceptability of bets, they should allow for both sides of a bet to fail to be acceptable.