Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigExact(60)
You were for one man or the other man.
If you were, for want of a better word, safer?
You are larger than you were, for sure.
He says, What did you think you were for?
QUESTION FROM GUEST: So you were for the Saints??? HENDRIK HERTZBERG: Yes, of course.
Either you were for the bombings, or you were a revisionist: there was no middle ground.
Does that mean you were for taking hostages in Beslan in 2004?
If you were for the Devils, Game 6 was an ugly, dispiriting way to go out.
Because I think that everybody wants to see you signing something that you said you were for.
At first, true, I did not — come si dice — realize what a blessing you were for me.
It was the classic accusation of flip-flopping: first you were for the rain, now you're against it.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com