Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigExact(2)
To remind you, sequestration is indiscriminately lowering both defense and non-defense discretionary spending by $109 billion per year.
"Anyone who tells you sequestration is going to simply disappear because both sides want to avoid it is either fooling themselves, or trying to fool you.
Similar(58)
7.25pm GMT If you think sequestration will help get a handle on the deficit... think again, write Thomas E. Mann and Norman Ornstein in an opinion piece titled "Five myths about the sequester": The annual budget deficit is projected to fall by almost 50percentt in 2013 compared with the height of the recession.
If you listen to American's military leaders talk about the impact of sequestration, you might be convinced that, in fact, the sky is falling.
Todd, you mentioned that sequestration "drags recovery 0.6% of the GDP".
Regarding carbon sequestration, you might want to look at the research by Fan and Gloor (Science, vol. 282: pp 442-446 [subscrequiredrequired]).
You reject carbon sequestration as "hugely expensive," but so, too, is the cost of continued overreliance on foreign sources to meet our nation's domestic energy needs.
Trying to explain that after four days of sequestration, you have a new understanding of the power of the state, and of the reason that the people's burden of proof is so heavy -- to protect citizens from this thing, this leviathan.
· Will you allow automatic sequestration of defense and domestic funds to go into effect as scheduled?
"But if you bring in sequestration and have to reduce staffing, it challenges the work we've done in previous years".
Howard J. Herzog at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology is a proponent of carbon sequestration, which you might call creating carbon landfills.
More suggestions(4)
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com