you detailed

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "you detailed" is not correct in standard written English.
It may be intended to refer to something that someone has explained or described in detail, but it lacks clarity and proper grammatical structure. Example: "In your report, you detailed the findings of the research project thoroughly."

⚠ May contain grammatical issues

News & Media

Science

Formal & Business

Wiki

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

35 human-written examples

HRW's 79-page report, I Already Bought You, detailed physical, sexual and wage abuse.

The Guardian

Google will find you detailed plot synopses, but in Ikićs's words, "it's a film about identity and what defines it.

The Guardian - Film

What about your critique of some aspects of Chicago economics, which you detailed in your recent book, "A Failure of Capitalism?" Have you received much of a reaction to that?

The New Yorker

An app on the phone then gives you detailed information — not only a signal when approaching a radar gun, but also (by using GPS) a display about speed and where red light cameras are.

The New York Times

Certainly not Jordan, which quarantines exports from the West Bank until they are proven to be free of Israeli content, further burdening Palestinian businessmen.Ted Levy Weston ConnecticutSIR – You detailed the problems inhibiting economic growth in Israel.

The Economist

Everyone in the auditorium was asking the same question: 'Why did these German doctors refuse to talk to you?'" Detailed medical records about Lubitz had suggested he had seen 41 doctors – many of them eye specialists – in five years, seven in the month before the crash.

The Guardian

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

25 human-written examples

BUSH: You wanted details, we gave you details.

The New York Times

Yes, but I couldn't give you details.

The Guardian

You detail people's conversation, clothes and jokes.

The Guardian - Books

#7: Are you detail-oriented?

Science Magazine

We will send you details.

TechCrunch

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When aiming for clarity, replace "you detailed" with phrases like "you explained in detail" or "you described thoroughly". These alternatives ensure your writing is both grammatically correct and easily understood.

Common error

Don't use "you detailed" in formal writing. It's often perceived as incorrect. Opt for clearer expressions like "you described in detail" to ensure your message is accurate and professional.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "you detailed" attempts to function as a statement where the subject ('you') performs an action ('detailed'). However, this construction is grammatically incorrect. As Ludwig AI explains, it's better to use alternatives like "you explained in detail".

Expression frequency: Rare

Frequent in

News & Media

28%

Science

28%

Formal & Business

16%

Less common in

Wiki

16%

Academia

0%

Encyclopedias

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, while the phrase "you detailed" aims to convey a thorough description or explanation, it's grammatically incorrect. Ludwig AI recommends opting for clearer alternatives like "you explained in detail" or "you described thoroughly". Although present in various contexts, as analyzed from diverse sources like The Guardian and The New York Times, its low frequency and grammatical issues suggest avoiding its use, especially in formal or professional settings. Remember to choose grammatically sound expressions to ensure clarity and credibility in your writing.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

you explained in detail

Replaces "detailed" with the clearer verb "explained" and adds "in detail" for emphasis.

you described extensively

Uses "described" to replace "detailed" and "extensively" to highlight the thoroughness of the description.

you outlined thoroughly

Employs "outlined" as a substitute for "detailed", with "thoroughly" emphasizing completeness.

you specified precisely

Replaces "detailed" with "specified", adding "precisely" to underscore accuracy.

you presented comprehensively

Substitutes "detailed" with "presented", and adds "comprehensively" to denote a full and complete presentation.

you recounted meticulously

Uses "recounted" instead of "detailed", with "meticulously" indicating careful attention to detail.

you narrated elaborately

Replaces "detailed" with "narrated", adding "elaborately" to show a rich and detailed narration.

you illustrated graphically

Substitutes "detailed" with "illustrated", and adds "graphically" to emphasize the use of visual or descriptive elements.

you delineated clearly

Employs "delineated" as a replacement for "detailed", accompanied by "clearly" to ensure understanding.

you portrayed vividly

Replaces "detailed" with "portrayed", with "vividly" underscoring the lifelike and detailed nature of the portrayal.

FAQs

What is a more grammatically correct alternative to "you detailed"?

Instead of "you detailed", use alternatives like "you explained in detail", "you described thoroughly", or "you outlined comprehensively" for better clarity and grammatical accuracy.

How can I use "describe in detail" correctly in a sentence?

Ensure the subject clearly performs the action: "You described the process in detail", not "you detail". The verb should be in the correct tense and form to match the subject.

What's the difference between "you described" and "you detailed"?

"You described" is generally more accepted and grammatically sound. While the intent of "you detailed" might be understood, it's not standard English. Use "you described" for clarity and correctness.

Is "you detailed" considered formal or informal language?

"You detailed" is generally considered incorrect in both formal and informal contexts. It is better to use clearer and more widely accepted phrases such as "you explained in detail" or "you described thoroughly" in any writing.