Exact(1)
They weren't interested any more in using the story you'd proved or got past the lawyers.
Similar(59)
You'd prove your chops through a series of coding tests (from a fibonacci sequence generator to some lightweight cryptography), with each challenge being graded based on you and your code's efficiency.
I don't know how you'd prove that, but then again it seems like a bit of a no-brainer how mano-brainer how War and Peace were written last year?
Choose any three of the above italicized reasons and show, step-by-step, how you would prove that these are the reasons why Giles believes in modern thought.
You would prove to all the cynics that there is no integrity to the political process -- that it was all a futile game to begin with.
The second thing that comes up following your original question – if you would favour a continuous level-wise versus a dichotomous assessment – I would say that is a matter of how you would prove objectively that the continuous level-wise assessment is more predictive – linearly additive – that one level is truly worse than the other level, in some objectively proven model.
The earlier they know you are interested about it, the more that you would prove that you are worthy of their approval.
I'd proved the concept.
She'd proved her point.
However, I think the sorts of mechanisms you describe would prove blunt instruments.
In a Gotcha War, you can lose even if you "win" because you'd just prove you're better at using harassment and manipulation which you probably didn't even cleverly develop yourself.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com