Exact(1)
Novel biofuel pathways with increased product yields are evaluated against conventional lignocellulosic biofuel production processes: methanol or methane production via gasification and ethanol production via steam-explosion pre-treatment.
Similar(59)
The compounds obtained in good yields were evaluated for their antiplatelet and anticoagulant potential using different in silico, in vitro and in vivo assays.
Using two switchgrass populations developed by divergent breeding for ruminant digestibility, the contributions of several wall-related factors to ethanol yields was evaluated.
In order to compare the labeling yields of the standard labeling protocol at 95 °C with and without ethanol content, the effect of ethanol addition (40 vol%) on labeling yields was evaluated with varying concentration of peptide (00.003 31 nmol/0.001–10 μg/0.0043–44.1 μg).
The reaction parameters temperature, substrate molar ratio, enzyme content, and added water, and their responses measured as conversion yields, were evaluated using central composite design and response surface methodology.
The pooled cMAb fractions were dialyzed and purification yields were evaluated by the modified human IgG1 ELISA.
The extraction yields were evaluated by comparison of LC-ESI-MS/MS peak area ratios of OC/OCD3 in sample extracts against a calibrate solution of 1000 ng mL−1 of OC in 1 mL acetonitrile in water (1∶1), 0.1% formic acid.
It is possible that AcIR measurements of grasses and legumes are not a sufficient estimate of their lignin content, and that if glucose yields were evaluated versus the true lignin content, a significant effect might be seen.
The effects of pretreatment pH, temperature, and holding time on the subsequent enzymatic xylose and glucose yields were evaluated in two central composite experimental design templates: one for low pH (pH 1 to 4) and one for high pH (pH 10-13), at varying temperatures (100°C to 140°C) and holding times (0-10 min).
The sugar yield was evaluated based on pretreatment severity.
Different responses, i.e. species percentage and yield, peptide recovery and iodination yield were evaluated.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com