Milk fat concentration differed among the 3 diets (3.92, 3.60, and 3.38% for CON, DG, and DG+AH, respectively), but milk fat yield was not affected by treatment.
However, the ethanol yield was not increased.
This low yield is not totally unexpected.
Yields are not relevant to the calculation.
But Treasury yields are not rising substantially.
Increased yields are not limited to cotton.
Yields were not optimized.
Viability was not found to differ among the groups.
It should be noted that size distribution and product yield did not differ among the S-WGA products, indicating that simple electrophoresis and DNA quantification cannot help the assessment of the product quality.
Eight (7%) subjects were culture-positive from at least one specimen; yield did not differ by HIV status or TB treatment history.
Since added fat did not depress appetite and milk yield did not differ between groups, higher BCS in the experimental cows at day 56 of lactation may be a consequence of better utilization of energetic precursors in peripheral tissue.
