The phrase "yield a significant effect" is correct and can be used in written English.
It is often used to describe the outcome of an action or event that has a noticeable impact or consequence. For example, "The new marketing strategy is expected to yield a significant effect on sales." This means that the new strategy is expected to have a significant impact on the company's sales.
By contrast, a similar analysis on the z-transformed data from the single-task and OSPAN conditions failed to yield a significant effect of Vehicle (F 9, 247) = 0.16, p = 0.320 and F 9, 247) = 1.04, p = 0.411, respectively).
Sex of subjects did not yield a significant effect.
Sex of subjects did not yield a significant effect, alone or in interaction with the other independent variables.
Using short-time exposure to the same three temperatures (20°C, 27°C, 34°C; 'hardening'), in contrast, did not yield a significant effect, independent of whether butterflies were left to recover for two hours or tested immediately after hardening.
Although the median thresholds were larger during active movement, the corresponding Wilcoxon signed-rank test did not yield a significant effect for movement type for convex curvature thresholds (p>0.05).
Testing butterflies acclimated to 27°C immediately after hardening (for 1 hour at 20°C, 27°C or 34°C) once again did not yield a significant effect of hardening temperature on heat knock-down time (hardening temperature: F2,84 = 0.94, p = 0.3934; sex: F1,84 = 0.30, p = 0.5879; interaction: F2,84 = 1.27, p = 0.2871).
However, variations in pre-tensioning force yielded a significant effect on both the in tunnel and intra-articular graft forces.
In an analysis of variance of the sentence durations measured in the four conditions, condition yielded a significant effect (F 3, 63) = 262.31; p < 0.001).
A repeated-measures ANOVA for the factor TIME (pain ratings 1 to 15) yielded a significant effect (F14,266 = 2.039; p = 0.001).
With respect to the second question, a one-factor within-subjects ANOVA yielded a significant effect of time relative to instruction, F 1, 24) = 12.23, MSE = 0.02, p < 0.01.
With respect to the first question, a one-factor between-subjects ANOVA yielded a significant effect of synapomorphy condition, F 1, 40) = 4.97, MSE = 0.05, p < 0.04, with mean accuracy scores with and without synapomorphies of 0.97 and 0.82, respectively.
