Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(1)
Exact(1)
Conversely, E1 and lagoon slurry extract were slightly more potent in the T47D-KBluc versus in the YES, which does not reflect the effects of these compounds in medaka.
Similar(59)
Robson has selected the same team that surrendered so abjectly against Manchester City on Saturday - yes, Manchester City - which doesn't really bode well if those Geordie funsters are to keep alive their very slim hopes of ending a 35-year trophy drought.
In addition, we used a single question to assess patient self-reported efficacy, (i.e. was CAM therapy helpful (yes or no)?), which did not take multiple variables into account, such as indications for treatment, duration of treatment, provider variability, or dosage and quality of herbs/supplements.
Cragh of course had no motivation other than to answer "yes", which he did.
In early August, on the eve of the act's passage in the Senate, Mrs. Obama wrote an op-ed article in The Washington Post encouraging lawmakers to vote yes, which they did, unanimously.
3) "During the last five-year period, have you had neck pain, for at least seven consecutive days but less than three consecutive months, that has bothered you considerably?" 4) "If yes, which year/years did you have such pain?
The exact wording of the questions was: 1) "During the last five-year period, have you had neck pain for at least three consecutive months that has bothered you considerably?". 2) "If yes, which year/years did you have such pain?
If the corresponding option is switched on ("-c yes") the combinations of (N_i^j) which do not satisfy the system charge-balance condition (sum _{i, j} q_i^j N_i^j=0) will be discarded.
It would be interesting if this could explain the stronger differences between the YES/NO and NO/YES datasets, which do not share a common molecule, than in the YES/NO and YES/YES datasets, which share cAMP.
Also, Dan Burton (IN), a long-time drug warrior, voted "yes," which he had done only once before.
To try to help, yes, which I did, with not many successes.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com