Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigExact(6)
A four-point response scale was used: "definitely yes," "probably yes," "probably not," and "definitely not".
†Response options for this item were: definitely yes, probably yes, probably not, definitely not.
We also asked further two questions that enquired as to the patient's attitude towards further surgery: (1) 'Would you have this operation again if it were required on another joint?' and (2) 'Would you recommend this operation to someone else?' (Possible responses: definitely yes, possibly yes, probably not, certainly not or not sure).
The answers to the last three questions are, you'd hope: yes, probably not, and oh, please God, yes.
If a long-haired, bearded stranger came up to you in the street and offered you the chance to see Ed Sheeran for 30 seconds for $2 AUD £0.966) in a peep show, would you say yes? Probably not, as the chances of the multi-grammy nominee sitting in a dark room below street level are very, very slim.
Yes, probably, not sure, probably not, and no.
Similar(54)
At both sites, participants selected one of the following options: "Definitely yes," "Probably," "Probably not," and "Definitely not".
Acceptors are those definitely accepting the vaccine (definitely yes (=1)) and those considered non-acceptors are those who gave less-accepting/hesitant responses (all other responses: probably yes, probably no, definitely no, don't know (=0)).
In the case of deletions, direct tests give a "yes" or "no" answer, whereas hypomorphic alleles of essential genes provide a "yes" or "probably not" answer because allele specificity and incomplete loss of function cannot eliminate the possibility that other alleles may show Ctf.
In the instrument, answers to these questions are presented as a Likert scale: 4. Surely yes; 3. Probably yes; 2. Probably not; 1. Surely not, and 9. Do not know/cannot remember.
Assessed with a single item, "On a scale of 0 (not at all) to 10 (extremely), how confident are you that the decision about surgery was the right one for you?" Assessed with a single item, "If you had the chance to do it again, would you make the same decision about surgery?" with responses of definitely yes, probably yes, not sure, probably no and definitely no.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com