Suggestions(1)
Exact(1)
In other words, the risk to make an error is increased for YES as compared to NO responses.
Similar(58)
And yes, the improvement as compared to other surveys occurs along a predictable fault line: For the first time, a poll shows Democrats slightly more positive about the legislation (79% say it's a good thing) than Republicans are negative (76% say it's a bad thing).
Reduced expression of nm23-H1 protein in the antisense-transfected (AS) clones was found by Western blot analysis as compared to wild-type YES-2 and YES-2/Neo (clone transfected with the neomycin resistance gene alone).
Irrespective of the correctness of the response, Heldmann et al. [31] observed an ERN for items classified as learned before (i.e. YES-responses: hits and false alarms) as compared to items classified as not learned before (i.e. NO-responses: correct rejections and misses).
The likelihood to commit an error with a YES-response (hit, false alarm) was twice as high as compared to a NO-response (correct rejection, miss).
Thus there were more words that needed to be rejected (non-targets require a NO response) as compared to words to be recognized (targets require a YES response) resulting in an unequal ratio of NO and YES responses.
Justification 1: By analyzing histograms of age for three groups of responses – Yes/No response, Refuse/Don't Know response, and missing data, we find that only 2.86% of respondents have Refuse/Don't Know responses, as compared to 97.14% of respondents having Yes/No responses to the desire to migrate question.
as compared with control fish.
The authors matched exposed and control subjects by age and sex; however, there were considerably different rates of current alcohol drinkers (yes/no answer) and recent respiratory infections (yes/no answer) in the exposed as compared with the control subjects (26% vs. 41%and40%40% vs. 29%, respectively).
And as of Saturday morning, support had grown to 56 percent, with 8,577 "yes" votes compared with 6,710 "no" votes.
e Patient response was yes (positive response) compared with no.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com