Sentence examples for years on science from inspiring English sources
The phrase "years on science" is not correct in standard written English.
It may be intended to express a duration of time spent studying or working in the field of science, but it is not a commonly used expression. Example: "After spending many years on science, she decided to pursue a career in research."
Thirty years on, science has no doubts.
He says the cost advantages to the technique might one day prove accurate, but in the meantime, "Nobody's built any so how do you know?" For its part, the report suggests DOE spend more than $100 million over the next 4 years on science, development, and demonstration efforts to try to catch up.
With the extreme focus in recent years on science, technology and math, I fear much is getting lost, and never is this more evident than in an election cycle.
Taxpayers spend £4.6bn a year on science: do we need to know what we get for our money?
On the other hand, fifth graders in Michigan charter schools made greater gains from year to year on science tests than their public school peers.
We have 30 years of science on this species, now the politicians just need to follow that advice and act".
At a forum 2 years ago on science in resource management, for instance, SEI president Deborah Brosnan broke the ice with a skit in which she played "the scientist from hell --nose in thell --noseanding endless cashell --nosefor experinenthe air offering ambiguous results in return.
The Imperial scientists are at the forefront of a hallucinogenic research revival and say they have 50 years of science to catch up on.
"In this case, we took 10 years plus — maybe 20 years — of science that we had on foot strikes, and running, and how runners run, and where the impact zones are, and what we need to design into it from a data standpoint.
Sixty years on, nutritional science has advanced, and important evidence of the impact of saturated fats has come to the fore".
I find it bizarre that when there are these very big numbers that need to be explained, the Chancellor spends his speech talking about spending an extra £10m over five years on teaching science.
