Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(5)
Exact(5)
It is noticeable that the rates of disability between 1987 and 2006 increased for those in the 45 75 years old groups.
Anti-HBs (p = 0.026) frequency was also different in the several age groups and was higher in the 46 50 and >51 years old groups.
There was no difference between the 22 35 years old and 36 60 years old groups in terms of RIBS scores (t(212) = −0.34, P = 0.734).
In addition, routine coronary angiography allowed us to diagnose previously unknown significant coronary heart disease in 49% of our patients, especially those < 65 years old (groups 1, 2 and 3), regardless of the presence of ST elevation.
Frequency of tooth brushing (OR = 3.98, 95%CI: 1.42 11.14 at 50 59 year old group), having own toothbrush (OR = 2.11, 95%CI: 1.11 4.02 at all ages)", smoking (OR = 2.71, 95%CI: 1.07 6.89 at over 50 years old groups) and bleeding gums (OR = 2.03, 95%CI: 1.25 3.30 at all ages) were significantly associated with number of retained teeth in males.
Similar(55)
The first was 0-5 years old group, which was sub-grouped into the <12 month-old infant group and the 1-4 year old group.
The 15-19 years old group is studied in details.
Four groups of animals were used: Group 1 (1-3 years old), Group 2 (19-28 years old), Group 3 10-166 years old), and Group 4 (middle aged, 9-14 years old).
The proportion of persons in 18-35 years old group whose perception of learning achievement was "greatly" or "relatively great" was 78.6%, higher than other groups with 76.4% in 36-60 years old group and 71.1% in 61-70 years old group.
Citizens in 18-35 years old group tend to be less satisfied with the lowest satisfaction rate, while the citizens in 61-70 years old group are opposite.
The proportion of persons in 18-35 years old group who believed that the surrounding learning environments could "completely satisfy" their learning needs was 12.6%, which was significantly lower than that proportions of 36-60 years old group (18.5%) and 61-70 years old group (18.2%).
More suggestions(3)
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com