"We say [the UN declaration] is totally, 100% wrong and baseless propaganda.
"If anyone thinks... that Malala is targeted because of education, that's absolutely wrong, and a propaganda of (the) Media," the statement said.
We hear about America from them and know that the propaganda was wrong".
But what's wrong with a little propaganda if it's clear what it is?
Later, he rejected the Civil Rights Act of 1964 as "civil wrongs," distributed FBI-generated propaganda defaming the character of Martin Luther King Jr., and attacked King as a Communist in a sermon he preached from the pulpit of his Thomas Road Baptist Church in 1964.
During the confrontation, a priest told the gay rights marchers: "This is propaganda [for a] wrong way of life".
A pro-regime propaganda rally went badly wrong, leaving Ceausescu helplessly waving his arms as he was jeered on live TV.
It is therefore particularly regrettable that he learned the wrong lessons from history by handing a propaganda coup to the leader of a terrorist organisation.
He said that the allegations of indiscriminate shelling from aid groups like Doctors Without Borders were "propaganda" and that it was wrong for United Nations officials to criticize the peacekeepers.
In your opinion, are there aspects of this story that the activists and NGO gloss over or get wrong, or is the dominant Chinese view mostly baseless propaganda?
