Your English writing platform
Free sign upSuggestions(5)
Exact(50)
Whatever the cogito's inferential status, it is worth noting a twofold observation of Barry Stroud: "a thinker obviously could never be wrong in thinking 'I think'"; moreover, "no one who thinks could think falsely that he exists" (2008, 518).
Am I wrong in thinking that's some chutzpah?
Am I wrong in thinking that this was a bargain?
But he is wrong in thinking that prostitution is inevitable.
Am I wrong in thinking that you ignored their warnings?
But he is profoundly wrong in thinking there is a legal duty to participate.
Similar(10)
But we took a wrong turn in thinking that the way they did this was by moderating inflation.
Where he is wrong is in thinking that there is much more he can do about them.
"That is easily said when one is a hundred leagues from the bastards and the fanatics, when one has an independent income of a hundred thousand livres!") But Raffel is wrong, surely, in thinking that by cultivating one's garden Voltaire meant anything save cultivating one's garden.
("Crush the horror! Crush the horror!" Voltaire's friend D'Alembert wrote to him once. "That is easily said when one is a hundred leagues from the bastards and the fanatics, when one has an independent income of a hundred thousand livres!") But Raffel is wrong, surely, in thinking that by cultivating one's garden Voltaire meant anything save cultivating one's garden.
Where he went wrong was in thinking that violence can be tamed principally by the use of reason, an illusion of the European Enlightenment, of which Hobbes was one of the first great exponents.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.
Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com