The phrase "wrong exposure" can be used in written English.
It is typically used to describe a situation in which something has been affected or altered due to a lack of care or proper attention. For example: "I ruined my vacation photos due to wrong exposure settings on my camera."
As a 40-bush grower, I've had roses survive a rampaging dog, floods, wrong exposure, nicked taproots and the sizzling of an electrified fence raised to contain the aforementioned rampaging dog.
Every year, hundreds or even thousands of American veterans who thought they survived military service discover that they were wrong; exposure to asbestos was a mortal wound that took decades to surface, evolving into the much-advertised mesothelioma, a terminal cancer.
However, utilization of biased measures could lead to a patient's misclassification into the wrong exposure category, leading authors to draw erroneous conclusions.
Moreover, misclassification occurring in the data examined would tend to bias any results observed toward the null hypothesis, since such effects would result in individuals being placed in the wrong exposure and/or outcome categories examined, and result in decreased statistical power to determine true potential exposure-outcome relationships.
This works well for average subjects but gives wrong exposures if the background contains either many bright areas, as in a beach scene, or very dark areas, as in front of a dark building.
Of course, then, for the next couple of years, everything I made was out of focus, wrong stop exposure, etc.
I thought, 'Wow, this is easy.' Of course, then, for the next couple of years, everything I made was out of focus, wrong stop exposure, etc.
Wrong-level exposure is documented in 0.32% to 15% of cases.
But many scientists, including some in government and the chemical industry, argue that Washington is taking the wrong path, allowing exposure to some products that are restricted in the European Union, Canada and even several American states.
Perhaps we have focused on the wrong window of exposure.
Depending on the component, a positive dipstick can be the result of exercise, vaginal contamination, wrong sampling method, exposure of reagent strip to air, or consuming vitamin C or foods with high vitamin C content.
