The phrase "wrong analysis" is correct and usable in written English
It can be used to indicate that an assessment or interpretation of a situation is incorrect.
Example: "The report was based on a wrong analysis of the data, leading to flawed conclusions."
Alternatives: "incorrect assessment" or "faulty evaluation"
A lawyer for the plaintiffs, Theodore B. Olson, said that was the wrong analysis.
Quite simply they have got the wrong analysis of what London needs".
The wrong analysis has also been provided as usual, as it happened during the Bush administration, by the United Kingdom.
"Some have the wrong analysis that by giving concessions to enemies, their anger toward Iran will be reduced," he said.
Sir Jeremy Greenstock, Tony Blair's special representative to Iraq until March 2004, concluded: "The preparations for the post-conflict stage were abject; wrong analysis, wrong people".
Yemen's official news agency, SABA, reporting today on a telephone conversation on Friday night between Mr. Saleh and President Clinton, quoted Mr. Saleh as telling Mr. Clinton that both countries must avoid "a wrong analysis" of the cause.
This was the wrong approach: analysis only made my obsessive thoughts more deeply entrenched.
That is unlikely to convince the many Britons who feel that if the Iraq war did not single-handedly create the Middle East's current problems, it contributed to an almighty mess.Although he resists the conclusion that ousting Saddam was wrong, his analysis of what has happened in the region has changed his attitude to dictators.
Mr Mitchell's dismemberment of George Bush senior's administration persuaded all too many people, Republicans as well as Democrats, that power in Washington had shifted inexorably from the imperial presidency to the newly imperial congress.The disaster of the Gingrich revolution proved just how wrong this analysis was.
Want to let the FCC know about how wrong their analysis is? Here's how to comment on the proposal to roll back net neutrality.
I don't want to suggest that Colavito is entirely wrong; his analysis complements the film with more possible interpretations, and readers can decide for themselves which parallels are farfetched.
