"wreck the environment" is a correct and usable phrase in written English.
It means to cause significant harm or damage to the natural surroundings or ecosystem. Example: The large oil spill from the tanker ship threatened to wreck the environment and its delicate balance of marine life.
Between 50 and 70percentt of mining projects in the region are carried out by Canadian companies who wreck the environment with impunity and routinely violate the interests and rights of Indigenous communities.
If we like Justin Trudeau's socks, or love the way he smirked and said, "Because it's 2015" when he was asked about his gender-balanced cabinet, then we're more likely to cut him some slack if we find out he's championing government policy that will wreck the environment or that his feminism doesn't go beyond mere words.
Green groups, such as the Sierra Club or Friends of the Earth, claim that the WTO wrecks the environment.
As designer Stella McCartney has shown, fashion can still be luxurious, beautiful and desirable, without wrecking the environment or exploiting workers.
Anyway, he opined, "the problem is the madness of the economic system growth wrecks the environment".In this section The Obama effect A Chinese ghost in the machine?
THE world is planting a vigorous new crop: "agro-pessimism", or fear that mankind will not be able to feed itself except by wrecking the environment.
The find would later devastate communities, fuelling corruption, wrecking the environment and breeding armed militancy and gangsterism on Nigeria's southern shores.
And he agrees that "wealth wrecks the environment"; yet he can't imagine that creating less of it could lead to anything other than apocalypse.
But a farm bill that preserves the status quo instead of addressing a food system that causes disease and wrecks the environment isn't even marginally serious about deficit reduction.
They have wrecked the environment, caused the biggest financial crisis in history and are using their deep pockets and for profit agendas to marginalize people's needs even further.
The danger is not that globalisation has gone too far (whatever that might mean), nor that expanding trade is impoverishing the third world, or workers in the rich countries, nor that the WTO has usurped the proper role of national governments, nor that trade wrecks the environment, nor any of the rest of this rubbish: all these claims are either meaningless or demonstrably false.
