Used and loved by millions

Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak quote

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak

CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com

MitStanfordHarvardAustralian Nationa UniversityNanyangOxford

would took

Grammar usage guide and real-world examples

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase 'would took' is not correct in written English.
The correct phrase would be 'would have taken.' This phrase has a meaning similar to 'would have needed' or 'would have required.' Example: It would have taken extra effort to finish the project in time.

⚠ May contain grammatical issues

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

60 human-written examples

Nor would 16-mm.

News & Media

The New Yorker

Why would P1 accept a single coin?

News & Media

The New York Times

Would U2 survive?

News & Media

The Guardian

Would £1m satisfy him?

News & Media

The Guardian

Would 007 fans expect any less?

News & Media

BBC

Why would 2016 be any different?

News & Media

Los Angeles Times

Would 40,000 additional troops help?

News & Media

Huffington Post

Why would 60 people do this?

News & Media

Huffington Post

Would WW2 have happened, and so on.

News & Media

Huffington Post

"Shove it" as you would 180's.

Would 16-0 have been nice?

News & Media

The New York Times
Show more...

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

Always use the correct past participle form of the verb after "would have". For "take", the past participle is "taken", so the correct phrase is "would have taken".

Common error

Avoid using the simple past tense ("took") after "would have". Remember that "would have" requires the past participle, not the simple past.

Antonio Rotolo, PhD - Digital Humanist | Computational Linguist | CEO @Ludwig.guru

Antonio Rotolo, PhD

Digital Humanist | Computational Linguist | CEO @Ludwig.guru

Source & Trust

60%

Authority and reliability

1/5

Expert rating

Real-world application tested

Linguistic Context

The phrase "would took" is an incorrect verb conjugation. The auxiliary verb "would" often indicates a conditional or hypothetical situation. The use of "took", the simple past tense of "take", is incorrect in this context. As Ludwig AI indicates, the correct form is "would have taken".

Expression frequency: Missing

Frequent in

Science

0%

News & Media

0%

Formal & Business

0%

Less common in

Science

0%

News & Media

0%

Formal & Business

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

The phrase "would took" is grammatically incorrect. According to Ludwig AI, the correct form is "would have taken", which is used to describe a hypothetical past action. Since "would took" violates standard grammar rules, it should be avoided in both formal and informal writing. Remember to use the past participle form after "would have". Alternatives like "would have required" or "would have needed" can be used depending on the context.

FAQs

What is the correct way to say "would took"?

The correct phrase is "would have taken". The auxiliary verb "have" requires the past participle form of the main verb, which is "taken".

When should I use "would have taken"?

Use "would have taken" to describe a hypothetical action in the past. It indicates something that could have happened but did not.

What are some alternatives to "would have taken"?

Depending on the context, you can use phrases like "would have required", "would have needed", or "would have involved" as alternatives to "would have taken".

What's the difference between "would take" and "would have taken"?

"Would take" describes a hypothetical action in the future or a repeated action in the past. "Would have taken" describes a hypothetical action that would have happened in the past but did not.

ChatGPT power + Grammarly precisionChatGPT power + Grammarly precision
ChatGPT + Grammarly

Editing plus AI, all in one place.

Stop switching between tools. Your AI writing partner for everything—polishing proposals, crafting emails, finding the right tone.

Source & Trust

60%

Authority and reliability

1/5

Expert rating

Real-world application tested

Most frequent sentences: