Used and loved by millions
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com
would took
Grammar usage guide and real-world examplesUSAGE SUMMARY
The phrase 'would took' is not correct in written English.
The correct phrase would be 'would have taken.' This phrase has a meaning similar to 'would have needed' or 'would have required.' Example: It would have taken extra effort to finish the project in time.
⚠ May contain grammatical issues
Table of contents
Usage summary
Human-verified examples
Expert writing tips
Linguistic context
Ludwig's wrap-up
Alternative expressions
FAQs
Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources
Similar Expressions
60 human-written examples
Nor would 16-mm.
News & Media
Why would P1 accept a single coin?
News & Media
Would U2 survive?
News & Media
Would £1m satisfy him?
News & Media
Would 007 fans expect any less?
News & Media
Why would 2016 be any different?
News & Media
Would 40,000 additional troops help?
News & Media
Why would 60 people do this?
News & Media
Would WW2 have happened, and so on.
News & Media
"Shove it" as you would 180's.
Wiki
Would 16-0 have been nice?
News & Media
Expert writing Tips
Best practice
Always use the correct past participle form of the verb after "would have". For "take", the past participle is "taken", so the correct phrase is "would have taken".
Common error
Avoid using the simple past tense ("took") after "would have". Remember that "would have" requires the past participle, not the simple past.
Source & Trust
60%
Authority and reliability
1/5
Expert rating
Real-world application tested
Linguistic Context
The phrase "would took" is an incorrect verb conjugation. The auxiliary verb "would" often indicates a conditional or hypothetical situation. The use of "took", the simple past tense of "take", is incorrect in this context. As Ludwig AI indicates, the correct form is "would have taken".
Frequent in
Science
0%
News & Media
0%
Formal & Business
0%
Less common in
Science
0%
News & Media
0%
Formal & Business
0%
Ludwig's WRAP-UP
The phrase "would took" is grammatically incorrect. According to Ludwig AI, the correct form is "would have taken", which is used to describe a hypothetical past action. Since "would took" violates standard grammar rules, it should be avoided in both formal and informal writing. Remember to use the past participle form after "would have". Alternatives like "would have required" or "would have needed" can be used depending on the context.
More alternative expressions(10)
Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:
would have taken
Corrects the grammatical error; uses the past participle "taken" with the auxiliary verbs "would have".
would have required
Replaces "taken" with "required", indicating necessity instead of a literal taking.
would have needed
Uses "needed" to express a past hypothetical requirement, similar to "required".
would have involved
Substitutes "taken" with "involved" to signify what something would have entailed.
would have demanded
Uses "demanded" to show that something would have necessitated a particular action.
would have consumed
Replaces "taken" with "consumed" to emphasize a hypothetical use of resources like time or energy.
would have necessitated
Substitutes "taken" with "necessitated" to formally express what something would have made necessary.
would have entailed
Uses "entailed" to specify what something would have involved as a consequence.
would have incorporated
Replaces "taken" with "incorporated" to indicate something would have included.
would have comprised
Substitutes "taken" with "comprised" to refer to what something would have consisted of.
FAQs
What is the correct way to say "would took"?
The correct phrase is "would have taken". The auxiliary verb "have" requires the past participle form of the main verb, which is "taken".
When should I use "would have taken"?
Use "would have taken" to describe a hypothetical action in the past. It indicates something that could have happened but did not.
What are some alternatives to "would have taken"?
Depending on the context, you can use phrases like "would have required", "would have needed", or "would have involved" as alternatives to "would have taken".
What's the difference between "would take" and "would have taken"?
"Would take" describes a hypothetical action in the future or a repeated action in the past. "Would have taken" describes a hypothetical action that would have happened in the past but did not.
Editing plus AI, all in one place.
Stop switching between tools. Your AI writing partner for everything—polishing proposals, crafting emails, finding the right tone.
Table of contents
Usage summary
Human-verified examples
Expert writing tips
Linguistic context
Ludwig's wrap-up
Alternative expressions
FAQs
Source & Trust
60%
Authority and reliability
1/5
Expert rating
Real-world application tested