would not receive

USAGE SUMMARY

'would not receive' is correct and usable in written English.
You can use it when expressing an unwillingness to accept something. For example: He refused the offer of help, saying he would not receive it.

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Science

Encyclopedias

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

58 human-written examples

My suspicion is she would not receive a fair trial.

The Guardian

I would not receive medical treatment for six years.

The Guardian - Books

Zynga said in a regulatory filing that it would not receive any proceeds from the sale.

The New York Times

They feared that students would not receive full credit for honestly answering the question correctly.

The New York Times

Mr. Icahn would not receive his money until the appraisal proceeding was over.

The New York Times

At the time, Mr Nadir claimed he would not receive a fair trial.

Independent

Women would not receive that right until the ratification of the Nineteenth Amendment in 1920.

Encyclopedia Britannica

Drivers without an E-ZPass would pay $9 and would not receive credit for tolls.

The New York Times

Before the sentence, Norway strongly expressed concerns that the men would not receive a fair trial.

The Guardian

Ferguson's mayor, James Knowles, said on Sunday that Wilson would not receive severance pay.

The Guardian

"Many predicted that his speech today would not receive as friendly a reception," Mr. Kerrey said.

The New York Times

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "would not receive", ensure the context clearly indicates what is not being received and why. This avoids ambiguity and strengthens the clarity of your statement.

Common error

Avoid using "would not receive" when the intended meaning is that something should not be given or sent. Focus on the agent doing the giving instead.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "would not receive" functions as a verb phrase expressing a conditional or future denial of something. It's used to indicate that under certain circumstances, someone or something will not be given, granted, or obtain something. Ludwig confirms its correct usage in various contexts.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

News & Media

40%

Science

30%

Wiki

10%

Less common in

Encyclopedias

8%

Formal & Business

6%

Reference

6%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

The phrase "would not receive" is a common and grammatically correct way to express that someone or something will not be given, granted, or obtain something. Ludwig AI validates its wide usage in various contexts, particularly in news, science, and encyclopedic sources. Alternatives such as "would be denied" or "would be refused" can be used depending on the specific nuance you wish to convey. A key writing tip is to ensure that the context clearly indicates what is not being received and why, avoiding any potential ambiguity. As a wrap-up, be aware that while versatile, "would not receive" is most effective when expressing a conditional denial or lack of entitlement.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

would be denied

Focuses on the act of being refused something.

would be refused

Highlights a formal rejection or denial.

would be excluded from

Emphasizes a lack of inclusion or participation.

would be ineligible for

Indicates a lack of qualification or entitlement.

would be excluded from getting

This alternative is a bit more descriptive as it includes getting.

would fail to obtain

Highlights the failure to acquire something.

would not be granted

Focuses on the act of not being given permission or authorization.

would be deprived of

Emphasizes the act of being denied something considered essential.

would miss out on

This is a more informal way to say they will not receive something.

would be without

This suggests a condition of lacking something.

FAQs

What does "would not receive" mean?

The phrase "would not receive" indicates that someone or something will not be given, granted, or obtain something. It implies a lack of reception or entitlement.

What can I say instead of "would not receive"?

You can use alternatives like "would be denied", "would be refused", or "would be ineligible for" depending on the context.

Is "would not receive" grammatically correct?

Yes, "would not receive" is grammatically correct. It follows the standard English grammar rules for forming conditional sentences.

How to use "would not receive" in a sentence?

Use "would not receive" to indicate a future condition where something is not obtained or given. For example, "If he doesn't pay, he "would not receive" the service."