In such a planet, the duration of the transient-layered mantle convection would be negligibly short in its evolutionary history.
Obviously, if we consider a single hairpin structure, the possibility of the hairpin to become a miR gene would be negligibly small because the promoter region of a miR gene also must be generated.
As a result, after q interactions with the server, the advantage of a malicious gateway would be only negligibly larger than q ∕ | D |.
Then the global CVIIM in this scenario would be 1−0.2/0.201∼0.005, a negligibly weak overall bias.
There would also be no way to distinguish this by mass spectrometry or another analytical technique (physically it is the same metabolite, differential labelling is no option as it is not predictive which cell will die first), subsequently, we can only work indirectly, therefore we only use growth conditions where cell death is negligibly low.
For monomer addition from solution, which we refer to as the direct pathway, the elongation rate would then be rd= kf × C, where rd is the elongation rate and kf is the rate constant of spontaneous actin monomer addition (neglecting the dissociation rate, which should be negligibly small <1 s−1 for ATP actin (Pollard et al, 2000)).
Let C0 denote the value of C that would be chosen if this fraction were negligibly small, and let C φ denote the value that would be chosen if this fraction were equal to φ, a positive number less than 1.
However, the variances in a real genome dataset, which would be approximately 200 times the size of the simulation dataset, would be negligibly small even if we use such short alignment blocks.
The degree of overlooking the ultramicro inversions hidden within the local alignments would be higher within the alignment between closely related genomes, because mismatches in short regions are negligibly small for highly similar alignments longer than ten kilobases.
The results showed that the total volumetric biomass was negligibly affected by c-myc over-expression and that without nutrient addition any increase in cell number would be compensated by a comparable decrease in cell volume.
So, for example, while you would be technically correct in arguing that it takes a shorter amount of time for the Earth to fall to the Sun's surface than it would take to fall to the Sun's center under the assumption that all the Sun's mass is located there (which is technically what we were calculating above), it turns out that the difference is negligibly small.
