would have remanded

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "would have remanded" is correct and usable in written English.
It is typically used in legal contexts to indicate that a higher court would have sent a case back to a lower court for further action or consideration. Example: "The appellate court would have remanded the case for a new trial if it had found sufficient grounds for appeal."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Wiki

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

2 human-written examples

Roberts and Alito would have remanded the case back down to the lower courts for additional findings.

The Guardian

Judge Battaglia said she would have remanded the case to circuit court for a full trial in order to settle what she deemed a central factual issue: whether the state could demonstrate that it had "broad societal interest" in retaining marriage in the traditional form.

Wikipedia

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

58 human-written examples

The report said that there were alleged breaches of his bail conditions shortly before the shotgun attack: "It is possible that Male Y [Williams] would have been remanded in custody if these breaches had been pursued and evidenced".

The Guardian

It said that if action had been taken it was possible that he would have been remanded in custody.

BBC

But thankfully the guy on Flickr has remanded grounded about the subject.

TechCrunch

A court in New York has remanded IMF chief Dominique Strauss-Kahn in custody on charges of sexual assault.

BBC

Had police been able to complete their arrest, Camp says the man would have either been remanded or placed under a court order preventing him from leaving the province or being near children.

Vice

The use of indeterminate sentences for public protection would have been sharply curtailed, and remand in custody ended in cases where a jail sentence would be unlikely.

The Guardian

"His remand status would have made it exceptionally difficult for anyone to engage properly with the voluminous documentary material, but it was especially onerous for him.

The Guardian

Justice Stevens said that on remand, the plan sponsor would have a chance to raise various defenses.

The New York Times

Even a custodial sentence was no guarantee of safety: had he been given a prison term equivalent to time he'd served on remand, for Gillian it would have been equivalent to an acquittal – because he would be free.

The Guardian

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

Use "would have remanded" when discussing hypothetical legal scenarios where a higher court is considering sending a case back to a lower court for further proceedings or fact-finding.

Common error

Avoid using "would have remanded" in non-legal contexts. The phrase is specific to legal procedures and can sound out of place in general writing. Choose simpler alternatives like "would have sent back" or "would have returned" if the legal nuance is not essential.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "would have remanded" functions as a conditional perfect construction within legal discourse. It expresses a hypothetical past action by a court, suggesting what would have happened under certain conditions. Ludwig confirms this usage through examples in legal and news contexts.

Expression frequency: Rare

Frequent in

News & Media

50%

Wiki

50%

Formal & Business

0%

Less common in

Science

0%

Academia

0%

Encyclopedias

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

The phrase "would have remanded" is a conditional perfect construction primarily used in legal contexts. As Ludwig's analysis indicates, it describes a hypothetical action a court would have taken—specifically, sending a case back to a lower court. Its usage is formal and professional, primarily found in legal documents and news reports. While grammatically correct, it is relatively rare, making it important to use it accurately within appropriate legal discussions. Alternative phrases like "would have sent back" can be used in less formal settings, but "would have remanded" carries a specific legal weight that those alternatives may lack.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

would have sent back

Replaces "remanded" with a more common synonym, maintaining the hypothetical action.

would have returned

Similar to "sent back", offering a slightly different nuance but retaining the core meaning.

would have sent down

Another way to say "sent back", common in some legal contexts.

would have ordered a remand

More explicit phrasing using the noun form of "remand".

would have deferred

Implies a temporary postponement rather than a complete return of the case.

would have referred

Suggests sending the case to a different entity or authority.

would have directed a retrial

Specifies the outcome of the remand, focusing on a new trial.

would have reversed and remanded

Indicates overturning the previous decision and sending the case back.

would have vacated and remanded

Similar to "reversed and remanded", emphasizing the nullification of the previous judgment.

would have asked for reconsideration

Focuses on the request for re-evaluation at a lower level.

FAQs

When is it appropriate to use the phrase "would have remanded"?

The phrase "would have remanded" is most appropriate in legal contexts when discussing the hypothetical actions of an appellate court regarding sending a case back to a lower court for further proceedings or reconsideration.

What does "remanding" a case mean?

"Remanding" a case means that an appellate court is sending it back to the lower court from which it came for additional proceedings, such as a new trial or further fact-finding.

Are there simpler alternatives to "would have remanded"?

Yes, in less formal contexts, you could use phrases like "would have sent back" or "would have returned" to convey the same general idea, although these options may lack the specific legal nuance.

How does "would have remanded" differ from "would have dismissed"?

"Would have remanded" implies sending the case back for further action, while "would have dismissed" means the case would have been terminated entirely. They represent opposite outcomes in a legal proceeding.