Used and loved by millions
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com
would have not
Grammar usage guide and real-world examplesUSAGE SUMMARY
The phrase 'would have not' is not correct.
The correct phrase is 'would not have'. This phrase is used to express something that did not happen in the past. For example, "I would not have failed the test if I had studied harder."
⚠ May contain grammatical issues
News & Media
Science
Academia
Alternative expressions(1)
Table of contents
Usage summary
Human-verified examples
Expert writing tips
Linguistic context
Ludwig's wrap-up
Alternative expressions
FAQs
Human-verified examples from authoritative sources
Exact Expressions
60 human-written examples
I would have not a bad back.
News & Media
"I never would have not written it".
News & Media
"Rationally, it would have not made strategic sense".
News & Media
Such findings would have not been possible using conventional evaluation methods.
Science
"I would have not submitted his name," Mr. D'Amato said.
News & Media
"Not disclosing would have not been fine," she added.
News & Media
Other states would have not been so forgiving.
News & Media
"Five years ago, Zale's would have not considered SoHo".
News & Media
"If she did not leave, she would have not died".
News & Media
It would have not been very productive, it would have been something messy.
This catalog would have not been possible without helps of many astronomers.
Academia
Expert writing Tips
Best practice
Always use "would not have" or its contraction "wouldn't have" to correctly express a past conditional negation. This ensures grammatical accuracy and clarity in your writing.
Common error
Avoid placing "not" between "would" and "have". This word order is grammatically incorrect and can confuse readers. The correct structure is "would not have."
Source & Trust
82%
Authority and reliability
1.8/5
Expert rating
Real-world application tested
Linguistic Context
The phrase "would have not" functions as an incorrect form of expressing a past conditional negation. The auxiliary verb "would" indicates a conditional mood, "have" indicates the perfect aspect, and "not" indicates negation. Ludwig AI identifies it as grammatically incorrect.
Frequent in
News & Media
38%
Science
36%
Academia
26%
Less common in
Wiki
3%
Formal & Business
3%
Encyclopedias
0%
Ludwig's WRAP-UP
The phrase "would have not" is a grammatically incorrect way to express a past conditional negation. The correct form is "would not have" or the contraction "wouldn't have". Despite its frequent occurrence, as shown by Ludwig, authoritative sources and style guides recommend avoiding "would have not" in favor of the grammatically sound alternatives. Using the correct phrasing ensures clarity and credibility in your writing.
More alternative expressions(10)
Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:
Wouldn't have
Contraction of "would not have", maintaining the same meaning but in a more concise and grammatically sound form.
Would not have
Expresses the same conditional negation as "would have not", but in the correct grammatical order.
Should not have
Indicates a past action that was inadvisable or wrong, similar to a regretful conditional statement.
Could not have
Indicates impossibility in the past, differing slightly by emphasizing the lack of ability rather than a hypothetical choice.
Could scarcely have
Implies something was highly unlikely or almost impossible, adding a degree of emphasis not present in the original.
Was not going to
Expresses a prior intention that was not fulfilled, shifting the focus from a conditional to an intention.
Did not have
States a simple lack of something in the past, removing the conditional aspect.
Had no intention to
Emphasizes the lack of intent to perform an action in the past, altering the focus from hypothetical outcome to deliberate choice.
Wouldn't do
Represents a general unwillingness or refusal, lacking the past perfect implication.
Would never
Emphasizes a strong aversion to something, not necessarily tied to a specific past event or condition.
FAQs
Is "would have not" grammatically correct?
No, "would have not" is grammatically incorrect. The correct form is "would not have" or its contraction, "wouldn't have".
When should I use "would not have"?
Use "would not have" to describe something that did not happen but could have under different circumstances in the past. For example, "I would not have gone to the party if I had known it would rain."
What's the difference between "would have not" and "would not have"?
"Would have not" is grammatically incorrect and should be avoided. The correct phrasing is "would not have", which expresses a conditional statement about the past.
Can I use a contraction instead of "would not have"?
Yes, you can use the contraction "wouldn't have" instead of "would not have". Both are grammatically correct and have the same meaning.
Editing plus AI, all in one place.
Stop switching between tools. Your AI writing partner for everything—polishing proposals, crafting emails, finding the right tone.
Table of contents
Usage summary
Human-verified examples
Expert writing tips
Linguistic context
Ludwig's wrap-up
Alternative expressions
FAQs
Source & Trust
82%
Authority and reliability
1.8/5
Expert rating
Real-world application tested