Used and loved by millions

Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak quote

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak

CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com

MitStanfordHarvardAustralian Nationa UniversityNanyangOxford

would have not

Grammar usage guide and real-world examples

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase 'would have not' is not correct.
The correct phrase is 'would not have'. This phrase is used to express something that did not happen in the past. For example, "I would not have failed the test if I had studied harder."

⚠ May contain grammatical issues

News & Media

Science

Academia

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

I would have not a bad back.

News & Media

Independent

"I never would have not written it".

News & Media

The New Yorker

"Rationally, it would have not made strategic sense".

News & Media

The New York Times

Such findings would have not been possible using conventional evaluation methods.

"I would have not submitted his name," Mr. D'Amato said.

News & Media

The New York Times

"Not disclosing would have not been fine," she added.

Other states would have not been so forgiving.

News & Media

The New York Times

"Five years ago, Zale's would have not considered SoHo".

News & Media

The New York Times

"If she did not leave, she would have not died".

News & Media

The Guardian

It would have not been very productive, it would have been something messy.

This catalog would have not been possible without helps of many astronomers.

Show more...

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

Always use "would not have" or its contraction "wouldn't have" to correctly express a past conditional negation. This ensures grammatical accuracy and clarity in your writing.

Common error

Avoid placing "not" between "would" and "have". This word order is grammatically incorrect and can confuse readers. The correct structure is "would not have."

Antonio Rotolo, PhD - Digital Humanist | Computational Linguist | CEO @Ludwig.guru

Antonio Rotolo, PhD

Digital Humanist | Computational Linguist | CEO @Ludwig.guru

Source & Trust

82%

Authority and reliability

1.8/5

Expert rating

Real-world application tested

Linguistic Context

The phrase "would have not" functions as an incorrect form of expressing a past conditional negation. The auxiliary verb "would" indicates a conditional mood, "have" indicates the perfect aspect, and "not" indicates negation. Ludwig AI identifies it as grammatically incorrect.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

News & Media

38%

Science

36%

Academia

26%

Less common in

Wiki

3%

Formal & Business

3%

Encyclopedias

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

The phrase "would have not" is a grammatically incorrect way to express a past conditional negation. The correct form is "would not have" or the contraction "wouldn't have". Despite its frequent occurrence, as shown by Ludwig, authoritative sources and style guides recommend avoiding "would have not" in favor of the grammatically sound alternatives. Using the correct phrasing ensures clarity and credibility in your writing.

FAQs

Is "would have not" grammatically correct?

No, "would have not" is grammatically incorrect. The correct form is "would not have" or its contraction, "wouldn't have".

When should I use "would not have"?

Use "would not have" to describe something that did not happen but could have under different circumstances in the past. For example, "I would not have gone to the party if I had known it would rain."

What's the difference between "would have not" and "would not have"?

"Would have not" is grammatically incorrect and should be avoided. The correct phrasing is "would not have", which expresses a conditional statement about the past.

Can I use a contraction instead of "would not have"?

Yes, you can use the contraction "wouldn't have" instead of "would not have". Both are grammatically correct and have the same meaning.

ChatGPT power + Grammarly precisionChatGPT power + Grammarly precision
ChatGPT + Grammarly

Editing plus AI, all in one place.

Stop switching between tools. Your AI writing partner for everything—polishing proposals, crafting emails, finding the right tone.

Source & Trust

82%

Authority and reliability

1.8/5

Expert rating

Real-world application tested

Most frequent sentences: