would bring him

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "would bring him" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used to express a hypothetical situation where something is expected to result in bringing someone to a certain place or state. Example: "If she won the lottery, it would bring him great joy."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

So I would bring him home".

The New Yorker

I would bring him to visit.

The Guardian

They knew Otpor would bring him problems.

The New York Times - Magazine

That would bring him to his senses.

The New Yorker

"I would bring him home tonight," she said.

The New Yorker

They said they would bring him there the following day.

The New Yorker

That would bring him much closer to ordinary.

The New York Times - Sports

If only for the season, football would bring him back.

The New York Times - Sports

The group would bring him breakfast, she promised.

The New York Times

Men would bring him out of the restroom to meet their families".

The New York Times

Some Palestinians said it was unlikely that Mrs. Clinton's comments, by themselves, would bring him around.

The New York Times

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

Use "would bring him" to describe a hypothetical scenario where someone or something causes a person to arrive at a physical location or achieve a particular state. Consider the context to ensure it accurately conveys the intended meaning.

Common error

Avoid using "would bring him" when describing past events. Use "brought him" instead to indicate a completed action in the past.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "would bring him" functions as a modal verb phrase expressing a hypothetical or conditional action. As Ludwig AI confirms, it suggests what might happen under certain circumstances. Examples show its use in diverse contexts, from personal relationships to political scenarios.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

News & Media

98%

Science

1%

Wiki

1%

Less common in

Formal & Business

0%

Encyclopedias

0%

Reference

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, "would bring him" is a versatile modal verb phrase that is frequently used across various contexts to express hypothetical or conditional actions. Ludwig AI confirms its grammatical correctness and widespread applicability. Predominantly found in news and media sources, this phrase serves to indicate potential outcomes or consequences, thereby enabling speculation and prediction. It maintains a neutral register, making it suitable for both formal and informal communication. When using "would bring him", consider the hypothetical tense and avoid using it to describe past events. Alternatives like "would take him" or "would lead him to" can provide nuanced alternatives depending on the specific meaning you want to convey.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

would take him

Focuses on physical transportation or guidance to a specific location.

would get him

Emphasizes the act of obtaining or reaching someone or something for him.

would lead him to

Implies guidance or direction toward a particular outcome or destination.

would carry him

Suggests physical transport, often with an implication of support or assistance.

would transport him

Highlights the act of moving him from one place to another, often formally.

would cause him to

Focuses on the result or consequence of something affecting him.

would deliver him

Suggests transferring him to a specific place or state, often with a sense of responsibility.

would escort him

Implies going with him somewhere as a protective or official action.

would fetch him

Focuses on going to get him, implying bringing him back.

would present him with

Implies offering something valuable or significant to him

FAQs

What can I say instead of "would bring him"?

You can use alternatives like "would take him", "would lead him to", or "would cause him to" depending on the context.

How to use "would bring him" in a sentence?

"Would bring him" is used to express a hypothetical situation where someone or something is expected to cause a person to be in a certain place or state. For example, "If he apologized, it would bring him peace of mind".

Which is correct, "would bring him" or "will bring him"?

"Would bring him" implies a hypothetical or conditional situation, while "will bring him" indicates a future action that is more certain. The correct choice depends on the context.

What's the difference between "would bring him" and "could bring him"?

"Would bring him" suggests a conditional or likely outcome, whereas "could bring him" implies a possibility but not a certainty. For example, "studying hard would bring him success" (likely) vs. "studying hard could bring him success" (possible).