would be works

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "would be works" is not correct in standard written English.
It seems to be a confusion of terms and does not convey a clear meaning. An example of a corrected phrase could be: "These would be works of art."

⚠ May contain grammatical issues

News & Media

Wiki

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

3 human-written examples

There would be works designed mainly to entertain — scenes of domestic amusement or young love, scenes from Shakespeare's plays — and others meant to arouse moral conscience about issues like poverty and the plight of unwed mothers.

The New York Times - Arts

In that first group would be works such as Frank Gohier's sculpture The Phillip (2006), a figure that looks remarkably like comic strip icon the Phantom, but is in fact a rendering of a neighbourhood eccentric in Darwin.

The Guardian - Arts

Shaven eyebrows are popular among baby-dolls, drawn on higher than where your natural brow would be works for giving your face that doll look, than blend eyeshadow up to your brow to give yourself that impossible bone structure.

WikiHow

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

56 human-written examples

It would be work.

The New York Times

Another priority would be working mothers.

The Guardian - Opinion

There would be work, education and security for all.

The Economist

More details would be worked out over the next year.

The New York Times - Science

Soon they would be working for President Hillary.

Independent

But the anxiety is something I would be working on.

The Guardian - Lifestyle

Mr. Palladino added: "It would be work to us.

The New York Times - Arts

But they insisted they would be working diligently anyway.

The New York Times

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When referring to artistic creations or accomplishments, use grammatically correct alternatives like "pieces", "creations", or rephrase the sentence for clarity.

Common error

Avoid using the phrase "would be works" as it does not follow standard English grammar. Ensure that the noun after "would be" is singular or use a more appropriate noun form.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "would be works" attempts to express a hypothetical situation involving tasks or creations. However, it is grammatically unconventional, as highlighted by Ludwig. A more appropriate structure is needed to convey the intended meaning effectively.

Expression frequency: Rare

Frequent in

News & Media

67%

Wiki

33%

Formal & Business

0%

Less common in

Science

0%

Encyclopedias

0%

Reference

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, the phrase "would be works" is grammatically incorrect and not recommended for use in standard written English. While a few examples can be found across News & Media and Wiki sources, as analyzed by Ludwig, it's better to opt for grammatically correct alternatives such as "would be pieces" or "would be creations" to ensure clarity and accuracy. As Ludwig AI explains, its structure deviates from common usage, which impacts its effectiveness in formal and professional settings. Therefore, writers should carefully consider context and audience when choosing alternative phrasings.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

would be pieces

Replaces "works" with "pieces" to denote individual items or creations.

would be creations

Substitutes "works" with "creations", emphasizing the act of creating something.

would be tasks

Changes "works" to "tasks", focusing on assignments or duties to be completed.

would be projects

Replaces "works" with "projects", indicating planned and organized endeavors.

would consist of works

Adds "consist of" to clarify that the subject is composed of various works.

would involve works

Uses "involve" to indicate that the subject includes or necessitates certain works.

would entail works

Substitutes "entail" to express that the subject implies or requires specific works.

would encompass works

Changes to "encompass" to suggest that the subject includes a wide range of works.

would feature works

Uses "feature" to highlight that the subject showcases or displays particular works.

would display works

Replaces with "display" to focus on the presentation or exhibition of certain works.

FAQs

How can I correct the phrase "would be works"?

To correct "would be works", consider using alternatives such as "would be "would be pieces"" or "would be "would be creations"". The choice depends on the specific context.

What is a more grammatically sound alternative to "would be works"?

A grammatically sound alternative to "would be works" is to rephrase the sentence to use a more appropriate noun form such as "would be a work" or "would be pieces of work".

Is "would be works" ever appropriate in formal writing?

No, "would be works" is generally not appropriate in formal writing. It's better to use more precise and grammatically correct alternatives like "would be projects" or "would consist of works".

What's the difference between "would be work" and "would be works"?

"Would be work" implies a singular, undefined task or activity, while "would be works" is grammatically incorrect. Instead of "would be works", use alternatives like "would be "would be pieces"" or rephrase to "would consist of work" to maintain clarity.