By no means is prospect theory intended to be a normative theory, which would be a theory of how people should make choices.
This prospective lord of the laws would be string theory, the alleged theory of everything, which apparently has 10500 solutions.
So understood, this question is not asking for a theory of ability, but for an explanation of what exactly a theory of ability would be a theory of.
Although driverless vehicles would be, in theory, inherently safer, testing prototype systems in the real world presents a number of challenges.
An example would be kinetic theory.
At least, that would be the theory.
Galileo would be, in theory, more accurate than GPS, and the receiving technology would be incorporated into devices like mobile phones and cars.
One example in this respect would be systems theory, developed by Niklas Luhmann [ 48, 49].
If reciprocal causation were genuinely crippling then there would be no theory of sexual selection or coevolution.
Some may argue that even if it would be, in theory, possible to gain community acceptance of an alternative such as ODE, other alternatives should be pursued first.
And I can make all kinds of theories about why that's happening, but you know those would be fake theories, because I know what's really happening.
