Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigThe phrase "would be scope for" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used to indicate the possibility or opportunity for something to happen or be developed.
Example: "There would be scope for improvement in the current project if we allocate more resources."
Alternatives: "there would be room for" or "there would be opportunity for".
Exact(6)
As a result there would be scope for devolved taxation to raise 40% of the Scottish parliament's expenditure.
Either way, there would be scope for reducing wastage by raising the quality rather than the quantity of newly trained nurses.Clearly, even for the most dedicated teacher or nurse, pay is important.
As for longer trips, gazing out across range after range of Austrian mountains that I have still not explored, I longed to return equipped with touring skis and skins, knowing that there would be scope for several lifetimes of adventure, crossing pass after pass and staying overnight in those well-appointed gemütlich mountain huts.
As long as credible medium-to-long-term adjustment programs are announced, there would be scope for fiscal stimulus despite current public debt levels.
At the same time, there would be scope for the creation of 46,000 jobs for implementing these social interventions.
If analogous networks could be constructed using clinical data, there would be scope for developing novel, targeted therapeutic interventions with more predictable immune-related side effects.
Similar(54)
You'd think in a band made up of a divorced couple who pretended to be siblings, there'd be scope for, if not full Gallagher fisticuffs, at least a little Supremes-style name-calling.
The main problem, surely, would be scope.
He added that while there would "always be scope for evasion" on property lettings because rents were not taxed at source, the individual amounts owed by many landlords were "not likely to be large" because of the tax-deductible expenses they can claim.
Even with a population fully engaged in the cost effectiveness/rationing debate, there would still be scope for disappointed interests to campaign against decisions.
There would at least be scope for a proper debate.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com