would be progressed

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "would be progressed" is not correct in standard written English.
It is not commonly used and may create confusion regarding its intended meaning. Example: "The project would be progressed if we had more resources."

⚠ May contain grammatical issues

News & Media

Science

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

1 human-written examples

Concerns would be "progressed through the fullness of time through legal proceedings," he added.

BBC

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

58 human-written examples

That would be progress.

The New York Times - Sports

Now that really would be progress.

The Guardian - Sport

He predicted that given more time, there would be progress.

The New York Times

Yet even that, in a way, would be progress.

The Economist

That would be progress, but it's not enough.

The Guardian - Opinion

That would be progress, said David Horowitz, president of the Center for the Study of Popular Culture.

The New York Times

The latest idea is to bring them together under one management.That would be progress.

The Economist

Nevertheless, too-big-to-fail would be progress of a kind for the Chinese financial system.

The Economist

More open hearings about the competence of new permanent secretaries appointed would be progress.

The Guardian

It might not be the sort of progress we're used to, but it would be progress nevertheless.

The Guardian

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

Avoid using "would be progressed" in your writing. Opt for stronger and more grammatically correct alternatives such as "would be advanced" or "would be developed". These options offer clarity and are widely accepted in standard English.

Common error

The passive construction of "progress" as "would be progressed" is awkward and uncommon. Instead of focusing on the action being done to something, reframe the sentence to show a subject actively progressing something. For instance, use "we would progress the project" to emphasize agency and clarity.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "would be progressed" functions as a passive construction, aiming to describe a future state of advancement. However, as Ludwig AI indicates, this phrasing is uncommon and grammatically questionable. It attempts to convey that something will undergo development or improvement.

Expression frequency: Rare

Frequent in

News & Media

50%

Science

50%

Formal & Business

0%

Less common in

Encyclopedias

0%

Wiki

0%

Reference

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, while "would be progressed" attempts to convey future advancement, it is generally considered grammatically incorrect and rarely used in standard English. Ludwig AI highlights that it's better to opt for more common and accepted alternatives like "would be advanced" or "would be developed". These alternatives ensure clarity and are widely understood across various contexts, including news, science, and professional settings. Therefore, it's advisable to avoid using "would be progressed" in your writing to maintain grammatical correctness and improve communication effectiveness.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

would be advanced

Replaces 'progressed' with a more common and grammatically sound synonym, indicating forward movement or improvement.

would be developed

Suggests a process of growth or evolution, offering a more standard way to describe something being brought to a more advanced state.

would be improved

Focuses on making something better, highlighting the enhancement aspect of progress.

would be promoted

Implies an elevation in status or position, suitable when the context involves career or hierarchical advancement.

would be furthered

Conveys the idea of supporting or aiding the advancement of something, often used in the context of goals or causes.

would be facilitated

Emphasizes making something easier or smoother to progress.

would be enhanced

Similar to 'improved' but suggests a more significant or noticeable level of betterment.

would be expedited

Implies speeding up the process of advancement or development.

would be streamlined

Focuses on making a process more efficient and effective, which can contribute to its overall progress.

would move forward

A more general phrase indicating progression without specifying the nature of the advancement.

FAQs

Is "would be progressed" grammatically correct?

No, "would be progressed" is not considered grammatically correct in standard English. It's better to use alternatives like "would be advanced" or "would be developed".

What are some alternatives to "would be progressed"?

Several alternatives offer clearer and more standard expression, including "would be advanced", "would be developed", or "would be improved". The choice depends on the specific nuance you want to convey.

Why is "would be progressed" not commonly used?

The passive construction using "progressed" is generally considered awkward and less direct than active or alternative passive forms. Standard English prefers more common and readily understood phrasing.

In what contexts might I mistakenly use "would be progressed"?

You might be tempted to use "would be progressed" when trying to emphasize that something is undergoing a process of advancement. However, it's better to rephrase to use more direct and accepted alternatives, such as "the project "would be advanced"".