would be of utility

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "would be of utility" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used when discussing the usefulness or practicality of something in a hypothetical context. Example: "Implementing this new software would be of utility to our team in streamlining our workflow."

✓ Grammatically correct

Science

News & Media

Academia

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

4 human-written examples

The study would be of utility value for the design and fabrication of silicon-based sensors which were used to measure pressure or the other physical quantities.

Optik - International Journal for Light and Electron Optics

However, the lesions were chosen to represent different areas of the skeleton and whilst a global measure of skeletal metastases would be of utility, this has practical limitations, particularly in patients with extensive disease.

EJNMMI Research

This information would be of utility if provided early at the bedside in the identification of patients with potentially unfavorable outcome.

Critical Care

Furthermore, during TH therapy, markers which better indicate correction of resistance in TRα-expressing tissues or toxicity in TRβ-containing organs would be of utility.

Best Practice and Research in Clinical Endocrinology and Metabolism

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

56 human-written examples

Extending our efforts to Syria would be of marginal utility at best.

The Guardian - Opinion

Use of a subpoena, as proposed by the dissent, would be of no utility in face of a policy of destroying evidence.

Cornell University

An improved understanding of NOx formation at high pressures would be of considerable utility to efforts to develop advanced combustion devices.

Combustion and Flame

Therefore, a direct method for broadly determining activities of an entire class of enzymes on a genome-wide scale would be of great utility.

Chemistry & Biology

Re "Not Science Fiction: An Elevator to Space" (Sept . 23: Two carbon fiber ribbons stretched beyond geosynchronous altitude would be of limited utility.

The New York Times - Science

"It would absolutely astonish me if we didn't identify a range of pharmaceuticals that would be of great utility to interrogators". Recent research with the hormone oxytocin is especially provocative in this regard.

The Washington Post

Because texture is a primary driver of watermelon acceptability, the development of methods to test for small differences in texture between new cultivars would be of great utility to fruit breeding efforts.

Journal of Food Engineering

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When aiming for clarity and simplicity, consider using more common alternatives like "would be helpful" or "would be beneficial" instead of "would be of utility", especially in less formal contexts.

Common error

Avoid using "would be of utility" in informal settings or when communicating with a general audience; its formality can sound stilted or pretentious. Simpler alternatives usually resonate better.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "would be of utility" functions as a modal phrase, indicating a conditional or potential usefulness. It suggests that something could be beneficial or serve a purpose under certain circumstances. This is supported by Ludwig examples where the phrase introduces potential benefits in different fields.

Expression frequency: Rare

Frequent in

Science

75%

News & Media

12%

Academia

12%

Less common in

Formal & Business

0%

Encyclopedias

0%

Wiki

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, the phrase "would be of utility" expresses potential usefulness or benefit, primarily in formal and scientific contexts. While grammatically correct, as confirmed by Ludwig AI, it's less common in everyday language, where simpler alternatives like "would be helpful" or "would be beneficial" are generally preferred. Ludwig's examples highlight its application in academic research and technical discussions. When aiming for clear and accessible communication, especially with a general audience, it is advisable to consider these alternatives. Its infrequent usage suggests that while accurate, it may come across as overly formal or stilted in many modern contexts.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

would be beneficial

Replaces 'of utility' with a more common synonym, focusing on positive impact.

would be helpful

Offers a simpler, more direct way of saying something would provide assistance.

would be advantageous

Highlights the strategic or competitive benefits of something.

would be valuable

Emphasizes the worth or importance something would have.

would prove useful

Suggests the usefulness will be demonstrated or confirmed over time.

would serve a purpose

Focuses on whether something would fulfill a specific function or aim.

would have merit

Indicates that something would possess qualities deserving praise or recognition.

would be of service

Highlights the act of providing assistance or support.

would contribute

Focuses on the act of adding or supplying to a particular outcome or goal.

could be implemented

Shifts the focus towards the feasibility and practicality of putting something into action.

FAQs

What does "would be of utility" mean?

The phrase "would be of utility" means that something "would be helpful" or useful. It suggests that the thing in question would serve a purpose or provide some benefit.

When is it appropriate to use "would be of utility"?

This phrase is most appropriate in formal or technical writing, such as scientific papers, legal documents, or business reports. In more casual contexts, simpler alternatives like "would be useful" or "would be beneficial" are often preferred.

Are there synonyms for "would be of utility"?

Yes, several synonyms exist, including "would be useful", "would be helpful", "would be beneficial", "would be valuable", and "would serve a purpose".

Is "would be of utility" considered formal language?

Yes, "would be of utility" is a relatively formal expression. While grammatically correct, it's often perceived as more stilted or technical than simpler alternatives. Consider the context and audience when deciding whether to use it.