would be needs

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "would be needs" is not correct and does not make sense in written English.
It seems to be an incorrect combination of words that lacks clarity and proper grammatical structure. Example: "The project would be needs more resources to succeed." (This sentence is incorrect.)

⚠ May contain grammatical issues

Science

News & Media

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

2 human-written examples

If this is the case, then the causal chain with respect to recidivism among this sample would be needs➔stress/strain➔recidivism.

Health & Justice

How willing healthcare professionals may be to monitor this, how willing patients might be to accept it and how effective an intervention it would be, needs testing in further trials.

British Journal of Cancer

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

56 human-written examples

A third volume would be needed.

The New York Times - Magazine

No more guano would be needed.

The New Yorker

"We thought more would be needed".

The New York Times - Science

Civilian administrators would be needed, too.

The Economist

A large force would be needed.

The Economist

Permission would be needed for any development.

The Guardian

What kind of equipment would be needed?

The New York Times - Magazine

Salvage reinforcements would be needed, he said.

The New York Times

Another would be needed for Johnno.

The New York Times - Magazine

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

Avoid using the phrase "would be needs". Instead, use grammatically correct alternatives such as "would be required" or "would be necessary" to ensure clarity and professionalism in your writing.

Common error

A common mistake is using "needs" as a verb after "be". "Needs" is typically a noun, and the verb form should be "need". Correct this by using "would be needed" or a more suitable verb.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "would be needs" is generally used to express a requirement or necessity. However, it is grammatically incorrect. According to Ludwig AI, this is an incorrect combination of words. The correct phrasing to express necessity is using "would be needed" or "would require".

Expression frequency: Rare

Frequent in

Science

50%

News & Media

50%

Formal & Business

0%

Less common in

Academia

0%

Encyclopedias

0%

Wiki

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, the phrase "would be needs" is grammatically incorrect and should be avoided in formal writing. Ludwig AI confirms its incorrect usage, suggesting alternatives such as "would be needed" or "would require". Although the phrase appears in varied contexts like science and news, its infrequent and incorrect usage significantly impacts its credibility. To ensure clarity and grammatical accuracy, it's best to opt for the suggested alternatives, thereby maintaining a professional and polished tone in writing.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

would be required

Replaces "needs" with the more grammatically correct "required", indicating a formal necessity.

would be necessary

Substitutes "needs" with "necessary", highlighting the essential nature of something.

would be essential

Uses "essential" instead of "needs", emphasizing the critical importance of something.

would necessitate

Replaces the verb phrase with a single verb, indicating that something will cause a need.

would call for

Implies a demand or requirement for something, changing the structure of the sentence.

would be useful

Suggests that something would provide assistance or benefit, differing slightly from a strict necessity.

would demand

Expresses a strong need or requirement, often implying urgency or importance.

would entail

Indicates that something would involve or include a particular need or consequence.

would have to be

Indicates obligation or inevitability, replacing the direct statement of need.

would involve

Similar to "entail", but focuses on the actions or elements that would be part of a process or situation.

FAQs

What is the correct way to express that something is required in the future?

Instead of saying "would be needs", use phrases like "would be required", "would be necessary", or "would be needed" for grammatical accuracy.

Is "would be needs" grammatically correct?

No, "would be needs" is not grammatically correct. The correct phrasing would be "would be needed", "would be required", or "would be necessary".

What can I say instead of "would be needs" to indicate a future requirement?

You can replace "would be needs" with options such as "would be necessary", "would be required", or simply "would be needed". These alternatives are grammatically sound and convey the intended meaning effectively.

How does "would be needs" differ from "would be needed"?

"Would be needs" is grammatically incorrect, while "would be needed" is the correct form. "Needed" functions as the past participle of the verb "need", indicating a passive requirement, whereas "needs" is a noun or the third-person singular present tense of the verb "need", which doesn't fit the sentence structure.