would be need

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "would be need" is not correct in English and does not convey a clear meaning.
It seems to be an incorrect combination of "would be" and "need," which should be used separately in a proper context. Example: "There would be a need for more resources if the project expands."

⚠ May contain grammatical issues

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

19 human-written examples

The bid would be need to be lodged in 2018.

The Guardian

Dan Marino for us would be need specific.

The New York Times - Sports

The first section looks at the voyage ahead – getting ready, the tools that would be need and so on.

Independent

Then with Cydia installed, the repository would be need to be added and then the package could be installed.

The Guardian - Tech

More importantly, Obama gives them cover: over a dozen Democrats who feel vulnerable to anti-energy ads in their next election could vote for the bill but still leave the senate one vote shy of what would be need to overcome Obama's veto.

The Guardian - Opinion

If the E-region dynamo is in control around 1600 LT, there would be need to consider a neutral-ion coupling process, other than the one described above.

Progress in Earth and Planetary Science

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

38 human-written examples

Athletes would be held to the same academic standards as other incoming students, and aid would be need-based only.

The New York Times

A third volume would be needed.

The New York Times - Magazine

No more guano would be needed.

The New Yorker

"We thought more would be needed".

The New York Times - Science

Civilian administrators would be needed, too.

The Economist

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

Avoid using the phrase "would be need" in your writing. It's grammatically incorrect and can confuse your readers. Instead, opt for alternatives like "would be required" or "would need to be".

Common error

A common mistake is using "need" as a passive participle after "would be". Remember that "need" in this context requires the "to be" construction or a synonym like "required" to form a grammatically correct sentence.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "would be need" functions incorrectly as it attempts to express necessity or requirement. It violates standard English grammar rules. As confirmed by Ludwig AI, this phrase is not a correct usage.

Expression frequency: Missing

Frequent in

Science

0%

News & Media

0%

Formal & Business

0%

Less common in

Science

0%

News & Media

0%

Formal & Business

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

The phrase "would be need" is a grammatical misstep. As Ludwig AI points out, it doesn't conform to standard English grammar. To correctly express necessity, consider alternatives like "would be required", "would be necessary", or "would need to be". Steering clear of "would be need" ensures clarity and credibility in your writing.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

would be required

Replaces "need" with "required", providing a grammatically sound alternative.

would be necessary

Substitutes "need" with "necessary", offering a standard and correct expression.

would need to be

Restructures the phrase to include "to be", correcting the grammatical error.

would have to be

Uses "have to be" instead of "be need", indicating obligation or necessity.

would be essential

Replaces "need" with "essential", emphasizing the importance of something.

would be vital

Similar to "essential", highlighting the critical nature of a requirement.

would be indispensable

Emphasizes that something is crucial and cannot be done without.

would be crucial

Highlights the critical importance of something.

would be in demand

Shifts the focus to something being actively sought or requested.

would be wanted

Indicates that something is desired or needed by someone.

FAQs

Why is "would be need" considered grammatically incorrect?

The phrase "would be need" is grammatically incorrect because it improperly combines a modal verb ("would") with the base form of the verb "be" and the noun "need". A correct construction would be "would need to be" or "would be required".

What are some alternatives to "would be need" that I can use in my writing?

You can use alternatives such as "would be required", "would be necessary", or "would need to be" depending on the context.

How does using "would be required" differ from "would need to be"?

"Would be required" implies a formal requirement or necessity, while "would need to be" is a more general expression of necessity. The choice depends on the specific nuance you want to convey.

Is "would be needing" a correct alternative to "would be need"?

While "would be needing" is grammatically correct, it implies a continuous or ongoing need. It's different from expressing a general requirement. For general requirements, "would be required" or "would need to be" are more suitable.