would be increase

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "would be increase" is not correct in English.
It seems to be a fragment and lacks proper grammatical structure. Example: "The result of the new policy would be an increase in productivity."

⚠ May contain grammatical issues

Science

News & Media

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

5 human-written examples

The results show that the tensile and flexural properties would be increase when NFs with higher tensile strength was used as skin fibre in term of hybrid composite.

Construction and Building Materials

What is needed would be increase in productivity rather than increase in acreage area.

Agricultural and Food Economics

Housing for Navy families would be increase, commercial strips would be rehabilitated, and single-family houses would be preserved.

Los Angeles Times

An ideal goal would be increase in life expectancy without increasing frailty.

BMC Geriatrics

This would be increase gene flow between invaded environments, but with a particular subset of genotypes that have proven to be effective at growing in invaded habitats.

Evolutionary Applications

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

55 human-written examples

Seating and plantings would be increased substantially.

The New York Times

The north-south divide would be increased as a result.

The Guardian - Opinion

The officers involved would be increased to 1,200 from 600.

The New York Times

Journey times would be increased by only five minutes.

Independent

It is entirely unrealistic to believe that taxes would be increased enough to provide that funding.

University of California, Berkeley

One option would be increasing it to four-and-one-half classes.

Stanford University

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

Avoid using the phrase "would be increase". Instead, use grammatically correct alternatives such as "would increase", "would see an increase", or "would lead to an increase" for clearer and more professional writing.

Common error

The phrase "would be increase" incorrectly uses the verb "be" before the noun "increase". Remember that "be" typically links a subject to a description or state, not to an action. Therefore, rephrase to use a verb that expresses the action of increasing, like "increase" itself.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "would be increase" is intended to express a future increase or rise. However, it is grammatically incorrect. The correct structure requires an action verb. Ludwig AI's analysis indicates that the phrase violates standard English grammar.

Expression frequency: Uncommon

Frequent in

News & Media

33%

Science

50%

Academia

17%

Less common in

Formal & Business

0%

Encyclopedias

0%

Wiki

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

The phrase "would be increase" is grammatically incorrect in standard English. As Ludwig AI indicates, this phrase does not adhere to conventional grammatical rules. While examples can be found, it's recommended to use grammatically correct alternatives such as "would increase", "would see an increase", or "would lead to an increase". These alternatives provide clearer and more professional communication. The primary contexts where the phrase appears are News & Media and Science, but its incorrect usage undermines its effectiveness.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

would increase

This alternative removes the 'be' to form a grammatically correct simple conditional tense.

would see an increase

This alternative uses "see" as a verb to introduce the increase, creating a more natural sentence structure.

would result in an increase

This alternative emphasizes the cause-and-effect relationship leading to the increase.

would lead to an increase

Similar to "would result in", this highlights the consequence of a particular action.

would have an increase

This uses 'have' to denote possession of the increase, which is grammatically sound but less common.

would experience an increase

This emphasizes the subject's involvement in the increase, suggesting they are the ones affected.

would be a rise

This alternative uses "rise" as a noun instead of "increase", offering a slightly different phrasing.

would be augmented

Replaces 'increase' with a synonym 'augmented', but maintains a passive voice construction. Slightly more formal.

would escalate

This alternative focuses on the progressive aspect of increase, implying a gradual or rapid growth.

would expand

This option suggest more of an increase in scope or area, rather than pure numeric growth.

FAQs

What is the correct way to say "would be increase"?

The correct way to express a future increase is to use phrases like "would increase", "would see an increase", or "would lead to an increase".

Why is "would be increase" grammatically incorrect?

The phrase "would be increase" is grammatically incorrect because it uses "be" (auxiliary verb) incorrectly before a noun ("increase"). The correct structure requires an action verb, such as "increase" itself or "result in".

Can I use "would be increase" in any context?

While some examples of "would be increase" exist, they are generally considered grammatically incorrect. It's best to avoid this phrase and use clearer, more standard alternatives in all contexts.

What alternatives can I use instead of "would be increase" to describe a future rise?

Instead of "would be increase", you can use alternatives such as "would increase", "would result in an increase", or "would lead to an increase" to express a future rise in a grammatically correct manner.