Used and loved by millions

Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak quote

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak

CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com

MitStanfordHarvardAustralian Nationa UniversityNanyangOxford

would be back

Grammar usage guide and real-world examples

USAGE SUMMARY

'would be back' is correct and can be used in written English.
It is used as a way of expressing an assumption about something that will happen in the future. For example, "I assumed that she would be back in time for the party."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

59 human-written examples

Modest would be back Monday.

News & Media

The New York Times

The Shakespeares said they would be back.

News & Media

The New Yorker

They would be back in an hour.

News & Media

The New Yorker

He said he would be back Thursday.

The man said he would be back.

News & Media

The New York Times

'I knew I would be back.

News & Media

Independent

I would be back.

News & Media

The New York Times

It would be back".

Then they would be back.

News & Media

The New York Times

They would be back later.

News & Media

The Guardian

They would be back in a week.

News & Media

The New York Times
Show more...

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

Use "would be back" to express an assumption or expectation about a future return, especially when narrating past events or conditions. For example, "I thought he "would be back" by now."

Common error

Avoid using "would be back" when simply stating a future return without any prior context or condition. "Will be back" is more appropriate for straightforward future statements. For instance, say "I will be back tomorrow", not "I "would be back" tomorrow" unless you're referring to a past expectation.

Antonio Rotolo, PhD - Digital Humanist | Computational Linguist | CEO @Ludwig.guru

Antonio Rotolo, PhD

Digital Humanist | Computational Linguist | CEO @Ludwig.guru

Source & Trust

89%

Authority and reliability

4.6/5

Expert rating

Real-world application tested

Linguistic Context

The phrase "would be back" functions as an auxiliary verb phrase expressing a conditional or future-in-the-past statement. It indicates an expectation or assumption about someone or something returning, viewed from a past perspective. Ludwig confirms this usage.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

News & Media

98%

Formal & Business

1%

Science

1%

Less common in

Academia

0%

Encyclopedias

0%

Wiki

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, "would be back" is a grammatically correct and frequently used phrase expressing a past expectation or assumption about a future return. Ludwig AI confirms its validity. It's most commonly found in news and media contexts. When using it, ensure that the context aligns with expressing a conditional or future-in-the-past scenario, distinguishing it from the simple future tense "will be back". Alternatives include "will return" or "is expected to return" depending on the precise nuance you wish to convey.

FAQs

How can I use "would be back" in a sentence?

Use "would be back" to express a past expectation or assumption about a future return. For example, "She said she "would be back" in an hour, but she never returned."

What's the difference between "would be back" and "will be back"?

"Will be back" states a simple future return. "Would be back" expresses a past expectation or assumption about a future return. The choice depends on the context and the intended meaning.

What are some alternatives to "would be back"?

Depending on the context, you could use alternatives like "will return", "is coming back", or "is expected to return".

Is "would be back" grammatically correct?

Yes, "would be back" is grammatically correct when used to express a past expectation or assumption about a future return. Ludwig confirms its proper usage.

ChatGPT power + Grammarly precisionChatGPT power + Grammarly precision
ChatGPT + Grammarly

Editing plus AI, all in one place.

Stop switching between tools. Your AI writing partner for everything—polishing proposals, crafting emails, finding the right tone.

Source & Trust

89%

Authority and reliability

4.6/5

Expert rating

Real-world application tested

Most frequent sentences: