Used and loved by millions

Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak quote

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak

CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com

MitStanfordHarvardAustralian Nationa UniversityNanyangOxford

would be at risk

Grammar usage guide and real-world examples

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "would be at risk" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used to indicate a potential danger or negative outcome that may occur under certain circumstances. Example: "If the project is not completed on time, it would be at risk of losing funding."

✓ Grammatically correct

Patients: 120 hospitalized patients with cardiac disease who "would be at risk" for a myocardial infarction.

Civilization would be at risk.

They said we would be at risk.

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

Patients: 120 hospitalized patients with cardiac disease who would be "at risk" for a myocardial infarction.

Civilization would be at risk.

News & Media

The New York Times

They said we would be at risk.

News & Media

Independent

Her job would be at risk once he was gone.

Then my honour and religion would be at risk".

News & Media

The Guardian

Thousands of homes would be at risk from rising groundwater.

News & Media

The Guardian

Otherwise the very legitimacy of the constitutional enterprise would be at risk.

He could lead a minority government, but would be at risk of losing a confidence vote.

Suppose I had recognized that my own allergies meant that my children would be at risk.

But the entire edifice of healthcare would be at risk of collapse throughout the country.

And without the World Food Program, about 1.5 million people would be at risk of starvation.

News & Media

The New York Times
Show more...

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "would be at risk", ensure the context clearly defines what specific negative outcome or danger is being referred to. For example, instead of saying "the project would be at risk", specify "the project "would be at risk" of losing funding."

Common error

Avoid using "would be at risk" in overly general statements without specifying the potential threat. Vague statements reduce the impact and clarity of your message. Instead, provide concrete details about the specific risks involved.

Antonio Rotolo, PhD - Digital Humanist | Computational Linguist | CEO @Ludwig.guru

Antonio Rotolo, PhD

Digital Humanist | Computational Linguist | CEO @Ludwig.guru

Source & Trust

87%

Authority and reliability

4.6/5

Expert rating

Real-world application tested

Linguistic Context

The phrase "would be at risk" functions as a modal phrase expressing a conditional or hypothetical state of potential danger or vulnerability. It modifies a noun or pronoun, indicating what or who might face negative consequences. As Ludwig AI confirms, it is usable in written English.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

News & Media

74%

Science

18%

Academia

3%

Less common in

Formal & Business

3%

Encyclopedias

0%

Wiki

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, the phrase "would be at risk" is a common and grammatically sound way to express potential danger or vulnerability under specific circumstances. As Ludwig AI indicates, the phrase is correct and usable in written English. It appears frequently in "News & Media", scientific, and academic contexts. When using "would be at risk", it's important to be specific about the nature of the risk to ensure clarity. Alternatives like "could be endangered" or "might face jeopardy" can be used to convey similar meanings with slightly different emphasis.

FAQs

What does "would be at risk" mean?

The phrase "would be at risk" indicates a potential danger, harm, or negative consequence that could occur under certain conditions. It suggests a possibility of something adverse happening.

What can I say instead of "would be at risk"?

You can use alternatives like "could be endangered", "might face jeopardy", or "may be vulnerable" depending on the context.

How can I use "would be at risk" in a sentence?

You can use "would be at risk" to describe a potential negative outcome. For example, "If the company doesn't innovate, it "would be at risk" of losing market share" or "Without proper safety measures, workers "would be at risk" of injury".

Is it better to say "is at risk" or "would be at risk"?

The choice between "is at risk" and "would be at risk" depends on the context. "Is at risk" indicates a current state of danger, while "would be at risk" describes a potential future danger. For example, "The ecosystem is at risk due to pollution" vs. "The ecosystem "would be at risk" if deforestation continues".

ChatGPT power + Grammarly precisionChatGPT power + Grammarly precision
ChatGPT + Grammarly

Editing plus AI, all in one place.

Stop switching between tools. Your AI writing partner for everything—polishing proposals, crafting emails, finding the right tone.

Source & Trust

87%

Authority and reliability

4.6/5

Expert rating

Real-world application tested

Most frequent sentences: