Used and loved by millions

Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak quote

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak

CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com

MitStanfordHarvardAustralian Nationa UniversityNanyangOxford

would be admissible

Grammar usage guide and real-world examples

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "would be admissible" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used in contexts where you are discussing the acceptability or eligibility of something, often in legal or formal situations. Example: "The evidence presented in court would be admissible if it meets the established criteria."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Academia

Science

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

42 human-written examples

It's not certain that they would be admissible in court".

News & Media

The New York Times

For example, confessions obtained through coercion would be admissible as evidence.

News & Media

The New York Times

What photographs compelled World Press Photo to consider whether amateur photos would be admissible?

News & Media

The New York Times

They include whether suspects can be excluded from their trials and what types of evidence would be admissible.

News & Media

The New York Times

There would be no right to remain silent, and hearsay evidence would be admissible, as would evidence obtained through physical coercion.

News & Media

The New Yorker

Ms. Sharma tracked down the activist who wrote that letter, so it would be admissible as evidence, and made requests for discovery and plans for depositions.

News & Media

The New York Times
Show more...

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

18 human-written examples

To avoid any misunderstanding regarding the scope of our ruling, we note that this case does not present the question whether secret recordings that were made prior to this decision would or would not be admissible in a judicial or other proceeding, and we express no opinion on that question.

Third, information from authorized surveillance in the national security area would not be admissible in evidence; to the contrary, the surveillance would apparently be for investigative and informational use only, not for [p116] use in a criminal prosecution and not authorized because of any belief or suspicion that a crime is being committed or is about to be committed.

Authorities also need less evidence for a designation than they would for prosecution, and they can rely on evidence that would not be admissible in a criminal trial.

News & Media

The New Yorker

Bharara told the dinner audience that what he was about to say was "hearsay" and would "not be admissible" – and then called Buchwald "the worst federal judge" he'd ever come across.

Kelly argued to Judge Evans that there would be insufficient evidence at a retrial because much of the original evidence would not be admissible if Glasser were retried alone.

Show more...

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When discussing legal or formal contexts, ensure that the evidence or information you're referring to meets the specific criteria for it to be considered "admissible". Be specific about which rules or standards it complies with.

Common error

Don't assume that just because something exists, it "would be admissible". Always verify that it meets the necessary legal or procedural requirements before assuming its admissibility.

Antonio Rotolo, PhD - Digital Humanist | Computational Linguist | CEO @Ludwig.guru

Antonio Rotolo, PhD

Digital Humanist | Computational Linguist | CEO @Ludwig.guru

Source & Trust

91%

Authority and reliability

4.6/5

Expert rating

Real-world application tested

Linguistic Context

The phrase "would be admissible" functions as a modal verb phrase indicating a conditional or hypothetical statement regarding the acceptability of something, typically evidence or testimony, in a legal or formal setting. As Ludwig AI highlights, it's often used to discuss potential or future admissibility based on certain criteria.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

News & Media

46%

Academia

30%

Science

24%

Less common in

Formal & Business

0%

Encyclopedias

0%

Wiki

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

The phrase "would be admissible" is a common and grammatically correct expression used to indicate the potential acceptability of evidence, testimony, or information in a legal or formal context. Ludwig AI confirms its usability in written English. Its prevalence in News & Media, Academia, and Science highlights its formal register. When using this phrase, ensure that the context clearly outlines the criteria for admissibility. Common alternatives include "could be allowed" or "may be considered", each carrying subtle differences in meaning. By being precise about compliance with rules and avoiding assumptions about automatic admissibility, writers can effectively communicate the conditions under which something "would be admissible".

FAQs

In what contexts is "would be admissible" typically used?

The phrase "would be admissible" is commonly used in legal, academic, and formal settings to discuss whether evidence, information, or arguments meet the necessary criteria for acceptance or consideration.

What's the difference between "could be admissible" and "would be admissible"?

"Would be admissible" suggests a higher degree of certainty or hypothetical compliance with rules, while "could be admissible" indicates a possibility or potential for admissibility that is less definitive.

What are some alternatives to "would be admissible"?

Depending on the context, you could use phrases like "could be allowed", "may be considered", or "is eligible for consideration" to convey a similar meaning.

What factors determine whether something "would be admissible" in court?

Factors determining whether something "would be admissible" in court typically include relevance, reliability, compliance with rules of evidence (like hearsay or privilege), and whether it was obtained legally. Rules vary by jurisdiction.

ChatGPT power + Grammarly precisionChatGPT power + Grammarly precision
ChatGPT + Grammarly

Editing plus AI, all in one place.

Stop switching between tools. Your AI writing partner for everything—polishing proposals, crafting emails, finding the right tone.

Source & Trust

91%

Authority and reliability

4.6/5

Expert rating

Real-world application tested

Most frequent sentences: