Used and loved by millions
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com
would be a nuisance for
Grammar usage guide and real-world examplesUSAGE SUMMARY
The phrase "would be a nuisance for" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used when discussing potential inconveniences or disturbances that something or someone may cause to another party. Example: "The construction noise would be a nuisance for the residents living nearby."
✓ Grammatically correct
News & Media
Wiki
Science
Alternative expressions(1)
Table of contents
Usage summary
Human-verified examples
Expert writing tips
Linguistic context
Ludwig's wrap-up
Alternative expressions
FAQs
Human-verified examples from authoritative sources
Exact Expressions
2 human-written examples
But lots of wells would be a nuisance for locals.
News & Media
Not because he thinks Mr Barroso should keep his job, oh no, but because it would be a nuisance for Mr Sarkozy to have to change his prime minister at this point in his five year presidential term.
News & Media
Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources
Similar Expressions
57 human-written examples
After all, he says, it would be a nuisance to die in a London taxicab.
News & Media
The strike would be a nuisance, residents said, but not a crisis.
News & Media
It would be a nuisance.
Wiki
Lights can be a nuisance for fireflies.
News & Media
Don't be a nuisance for irrelevant users.
Wiki
The local traffic density for truck delivery to such a huge plant would be an unacceptable nuisance for the local population and requires additional money to extend and maintain the local road infrastructure.
The film would be a mere nuisance if not for its shameless exploitation of school shootings to advance its agenda.
News & Media
"As it rained, even though it was a nuisance walking around, we knew it would be a bonus for her".
News & Media
That might not bother people but it'd be a real nuisance for someone with ADD.
News & Media
Expert writing Tips
Best practice
When using "would be a nuisance for", consider the audience and context. It is suitable for formal and informal settings, but ensure the level of formality aligns with the overall tone of your writing. In professional writing, you can also use more formal alternatives like "would be an inconvenience for".
Common error
While "would be a nuisance for" is generally acceptable, avoid overuse in highly formal or academic writing. Opt for more sophisticated synonyms like "would present an obstacle to" or "would be detrimental to" to maintain a professional tone.
Source & Trust
88%
Authority and reliability
4.5/5
Expert rating
Real-world application tested
Linguistic Context
The phrase "would be a nuisance for" functions as a predicative adjective phrase, describing the potential negative impact or inconvenience something might cause. As confirmed by Ludwig, the phrase is correct. Examples show its utility in conveying potential disruptions.
Frequent in
News & Media
40%
Wiki
30%
Science
10%
Less common in
Formal & Business
5%
Encyclopedias
5%
Reference
5%
Ludwig's WRAP-UP
In summary, "would be a nuisance for" is a grammatically sound and commonly used phrase that describes something or someone causing potential inconvenience or annoyance. As Ludwig AI confirms, it is correct and usable in written English. While versatile across different contexts, from news to wikis, remember to consider your audience and opt for more formal synonyms in highly professional settings to maintain a polished tone. The phrase is generally considered neutral, suitable for a wide range of communication needs. Alternatives like ""would be troublesome for"" or ""would be inconvenient for"" offer subtle variations in meaning and formality.
More alternative expressions(6)
Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:
would be troublesome for
Replaces "nuisance" with "troublesome", emphasizing the difficulty or problems caused.
would be inconvenient for
Substitutes "nuisance" with "inconvenient", highlighting the lack of ease or comfort.
would be bothersome to
Uses "bothersome" instead of "nuisance", focusing on the irritation caused.
would be disruptive to
Emphasizes the interruption or disturbance caused.
would cause problems for
Focuses on the problems resulting from the action or situation.
would create difficulties for
Highlights the difficulties that would arise.
would pose a challenge for
Emphasizes the challenging aspect of the situation.
would be a headache for
Uses a more informal term, "headache", to describe the nuisance.
would be an imposition on
Highlights the burden or inconvenience placed on someone.
would present an obstacle to
Focuses on the hindering or obstructive nature of the situation.
FAQs
What does "would be a nuisance for" mean?
It means something or someone would cause inconvenience, annoyance, or trouble for another person or group.
How can I use "would be a nuisance for" in a sentence?
For example, "The construction noise would be a nuisance for the residents living nearby", or "Failing to submit the report on time would be a nuisance for the entire team".
What can I say instead of "would be a nuisance for"?
You can use alternatives like "would be troublesome for", "would be inconvenient for", or "would be bothersome to" depending on the context.
Is "would be a nuisance for" formal or informal?
The phrase is generally considered neutral and can be used in both formal and informal contexts, although more formal alternatives exist for professional writing.
Editing plus AI, all in one place.
Stop switching between tools. Your AI writing partner for everything—polishing proposals, crafting emails, finding the right tone.
Table of contents
Usage summary
Human-verified examples
Expert writing tips
Linguistic context
Ludwig's wrap-up
Alternative expressions
FAQs
Source & Trust
88%
Authority and reliability
4.5/5
Expert rating
Real-world application tested