Used and loved by millions
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com
worth of junk
Grammar usage guide and real-world examplesUSAGE SUMMARY
The phrase "worth of junk" is not correct in standard written English.
The correct expression is "worthless junk" or "worth of junk" could be rephrased for clarity. Example: "This old computer is just worth of junk and should be thrown away."
⚠ May contain grammatical issues
News & Media
Wiki
Science
Alternative expressions(1)
Table of contents
Usage summary
Human-verified examples
Expert writing tips
Linguistic context
Ludwig's wrap-up
Alternative expressions
FAQs
Human-verified examples from authoritative sources
Exact Expressions
19 human-written examples
Twenty-five dollars worth of junk.
News & Media
You can't go around and sell $500 million worth of junk bonds and buy them back the next day".
News & Media
For example, if you're eating 1,000 calories worth of junk food, you may be within your calorie allowance but it's not conducive to a healthy balanced diet.
News & Media
By the time they come out, it looks like a safari, with all them politicians as native bearers He must have had five thousand dollars' worth of junk".
News & Media
Within months, he reversed course, issuing $675 million worth of junk bonds, with a 14percentt interest rate, to finish construction and get the Taj open.
News & Media
Another woman sleepwalked into her kitchen, clawed through her refrigerator like an animal and consumed thousands of calories worth of junk food.
News & Media
Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources
Similar Expressions
40 human-written examples
Apex has several hundred thousand dollars' worth of junking equipment, employs 25 men & destroys 50 cars a day.
News & Media
For 1.15-million euros (about $1.5 million, and half the original asking price) three local entrepreneurs — Florian Niedermeier, Bernd Maier and Nikolaus Driessen — pooled their resources to buy the hall and set about clearing the building of decades' worth of accumulated junk.
News & Media
Half the glory of having millions of dollars worth of celeb junk, is putting on a show of primping and preening, just like their idols.
News & Media
The snow is finally melting in the Northwest Territories, revealing a year's worth of mouldy junk in Yellowknife, the capital city.
News & Media
In fact, they sold $23 billion worth of this junk to AIG (they're lucky we're not asking for all of that back).They set them to blow and then bet against them.
News & Media
Expert writing Tips
Best practice
When describing items of little value, consider using adjectives like "worthless", "useless", or "cheap" to enhance clarity and grammatical correctness instead of "worth of junk".
Common error
Avoid using the phrase "worth of junk" as it's not standard English. Instead, opt for grammatically sound alternatives such as "worthless junk" or rephrase to clarify the intended meaning, like "junk worth [amount]"
Source & Trust
89%
Authority and reliability
2.8/5
Expert rating
Real-world application tested
Linguistic Context
The phrase "worth of junk" functions as a noun phrase, typically describing a collection of items considered to be of very low or no value. However, according to Ludwig AI, it's not correct in standard written English.
Frequent in
News & Media
60%
Wiki
20%
Science
20%
Less common in
Formal & Business
0%
Academia
0%
Encyclopedias
0%
Ludwig's WRAP-UP
In summary, while the phrase "worth of junk" appears in various sources, Ludwig AI identifies it as grammatically incorrect. Its function is to describe items of little value, but more grammatically sound alternatives like "worthless junk" or rephrasing the sentence are recommended. The phrase is mostly used in informal contexts and news media. When describing items lacking value, clarity and grammatical correctness are key.
More alternative expressions(10)
Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:
worthless junk
Replaces "worth of" with the single word "worthless" for greater grammatical correctness and conciseness.
useless garbage
Substitutes both "worth" and "junk" with synonyms that emphasize lack of utility and value.
valueless trash
Replaces "worth" and "junk" with synonyms emphasizing lack of financial or practical value and disposability.
cheap rubbish
Emphasizes low cost and poor quality, suggesting the junk has little to no value.
insignificant waste
Focuses on the lack of importance and the wasteful nature of the junk.
unimportant clutter
Highlights the lack of significance and the obstructive nature of the items.
disposable items
Emphasizes the intended use and low value, meaning they are meant to be thrown away.
throwaway stuff
Suggests the items are meant to be discarded, indicating their low value.
unwanted possessions
Highlights that the items are not desired, implying they have little value to the owner.
second-rate goods
Highlights the poor quality and inferior nature of the "junk".
FAQs
Is "worth of junk" grammatically correct?
No, "worth of junk" is generally considered grammatically incorrect. It's better to use phrases like "worthless junk" or rephrase the sentence to improve clarity.
What can I say instead of "worth of junk"?
Alternatives include "worthless junk", "useless garbage", or specifying the value, such as "junk worth [amount]".
How can I use "worthless junk" in a sentence?
Example: "The attic was filled with worthless junk that needed to be cleared out."
What is the difference between "worth of junk" and "worthless junk"?
"Worth of junk" is grammatically awkward and uncommon. "Worthless junk" is grammatically correct and means the items have no value.
Editing plus AI, all in one place.
Stop switching between tools. Your AI writing partner for everything—polishing proposals, crafting emails, finding the right tone.
Table of contents
Usage summary
Human-verified examples
Expert writing tips
Linguistic context
Ludwig's wrap-up
Alternative expressions
FAQs
Source & Trust
89%
Authority and reliability
2.8/5
Expert rating
Real-world application tested