Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(2)
Exact(7)
They were willing to pay an average amount of $2955 in health status 1 and an average amount of $5966 in health status 6 (worst status) for internal preferences.
Participants were willing to pay an average amount of $2955 in health status 1 and an average amount of $5966 in health status 6 (worst status) for internal preferences.
The scales and items are linearly transformed to a 0 to 100 score, where 100 represents the worst status.
Each item response is coded 0 to 3 (indicating best through to worst status) and can be considered separately or summed to form a simple, unweighted profile [ 19].
A 2003 study found strong associations between conflicts and maternal health: 16 out of the 25 countries with the worst status of mothers' wellbeing were experiencing conflict [ 10].
The raw scores were transformed; the final scores for each of the eight items range from 0 to 100, with 0 signifying the worst status and 100 signifying the best status.
Similar(53)
*Summary raw score was transformed into a 0 (worst health status) – 100 (best health status) scale with the following algorithm: Scale score of the abbreviated form = (the sum of the 5 items - lowest possible score)* 100/possible raw score range.
The scales ranged from 0 (worst health status) to 100 (best health status).
The Oxford hip score is a disease specific instrument with 12 questions and responses expressed on a four point scale to produce an overall score ranging from 0 (worst health status) to 48 (best health status).
The Oxford hip score and the Oxford knee score both included 12 questions covering pain and ability related to the hip or knee problem. 10 11 Responses to each question (expressed on a 4 point scale) are summed up to provide an overall score ranging from 0 (worst health status) to 48 (best health status).
The risk of death increased in patients with the worst performance status while, second surgery, MGMT gene status and tumor extension did not influence OS.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com