Suggestions(1)
Exact(3)
P r (V i ∩V s ) is the worst probability because the intruder is around to reach its target and hack the security system.
Ranking the 26 startups, from best to worst design performance, as well as, from a best to worst probability of success, shows very different performance changes.
The ACA questionnaire first asked participants to rate how important they considered the difference between the best and worst probability of each outcome (all else being equal) on a four-point scale (Fraenkel et al, 2001, 2004a, 2004b).
Similar(56)
The independent variables were coded with a sign change for all observations pertinent to the worst choice data, to reflect the reciprocal relationship between best and worst probabilities.
Five (4%) participants conferred the highest value to the worst outcome probability in one of the outcomes and were excluded from further analyses.
For each of three types of ambiguity, we compute a robust Ramsey plan and an associated worst-case probability model.
The problem is then to design a detection scheme to minimize the worst-case probability of error (e.g., probability of false alarm plus probability of mis-detection), that is, finding a detector such that.
Since the NPCI method shows the worst coverage probabilities and does not have the narrowest intervals (Figure 2; Table 2), further discussion of NPCI results is minimized.
The detection time will increase when more channels are sensed by the cyclostationary detector, i.e., higher value of P. In the worst case, the probability of detection, the probability of false alarm, and the mean detection time can be evaluated by putting P r ≈ 1 and P ≈ 1 in (14), (15), and (24): P d ≈ P d, EC (28) P f ≈ P f, EC (29) T ¯ ≈ N T 1 + T 2 (30).
For example, the utility of "2" of the cooperative outcome means that the agent is indifferent between this outcome and a gamble which offers her "0" (the worst outcome) with probability 1/3 and "3" (her best outcome) with probability 2/3.
We found that in the worst case the probability of re-identification is 0.027% and only about 5% of users in the set of SCT profiles have this level of risk, while the other users have a lower risk of privacy violation.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com