Suggestions(1)
Exact(1)
Table 3 Similarity correlations Correlation r Our proposed measure 0.92 Mean of all participants 0.938 Worst participant 0.73 Best participant 0.947 Table 4 Evaluation results Precision Recall F-scorere 88.12 83.24 85.61.
Similar(59)
The Nazi plan required a populace that was, at best, willing to look the other way and, at worst, a participant.
A person-level analysis, in which the worst knee per participant was analysed, also gave similar results (Supplementary Table 8).
Participants with bilateral symptoms only received treatment for the foot with the worst symptoms and participants were asked to concentrate on the pain in that foot when completing all outcome measures.
Additionally, we selected the 50% (21 participants) worst detection performers (mean percentage correct = 50.1%) and tested conflict adaptation across these "poor detectors".
Using an 11-point scale, ranging from 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst pain imaginable), participants will be asked to answer the following question: " On a scale of 0 to 10, where 0 corresponds to no pain and 10 to the worst imaginable pain, evaluate the intensity of your neck pain at this moment".
The bottom step represented the worst life (1) the participant could imagine, whereas the top step represented the best life (10) imaginable.
The Global Assessment Scale (GAS) was used to provide a measure of overall level of functioning during each participant's worst lifetime episodes of both depression and mood elevation; scores on this scale range from 1 (severe psychiatric disturbance) to 100 (good mental health).
In order to analyse the distribution of domain and total scores for the two asthma-specific quality of life measures mean, median, standard deviation (SD), percentage of participants with missing items, observed range, the percentage of participants with the worst possible score ('floor') and percentage of participants with the best possible score ('ceiling') were calculated.
Participants with the worst glycemic control were significantly younger than participants with the best glycemic control.
Interestingly, participants having best recall scores resulted in numerous hubs and many more functional connections compared to participants having worst recall scores.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com