Used and loved by millions
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com
worse population
Grammar usage guide and real-world examplesUSAGE SUMMARY
The phrase "worse population" is not correct and may lead to confusion in written English.
It is not a standard expression and lacks clarity; it may be intended to compare populations but does not convey a clear meaning. Example: "The city has a worse population in terms of health outcomes compared to the national average."
⚠ May contain grammatical issues
Science
News & Media
Wiki
Alternative expressions(2)
Table of contents
Usage summary
Human-verified examples
Expert writing tips
Linguistic context
Ludwig's wrap-up
Alternative expressions
FAQs
Human-verified examples from authoritative sources
Exact Expressions
5 human-written examples
The program was considered a disaster even by its initiator; most of the rhinos died and no offspring were produced for nearly 20 years, representing an even worse population decline than in the wild.
Wiki
Some previous studies have also found worse population health status in Eastern states 15, 28, 41.
Rural areas are often characterised by worse population health outcomes and more difficult access to health care.
With some exceptions [ 9, 12], cross-sectional studies found significantly worse population health at higher levels of income inequality [ 1, 15– 17].
It found that communities that were economically worse-off and had worse population health were less likely to receive an obligated physician than underserved communities that were economically better-off and had better population health [ 89].
Science
Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources
Similar Expressions
54 human-written examples
Conversely, a stagnant, or worse, decreasing population increases the influence of capital accumulated in previous generations.
News & Media
Worse still, population growth currently stands at around 2%, so the standard of living is hardly rising at all.Efforts to clean up the country's finances tend to get lost in the congressional wash.
News & Media
The most common contaminants in runoff are heavy metals, inorganic salts, aromatic hydrocarbons, etc. Urban runoff water pollution is one of the leading causes of water pollution and becomes worse with population growth and urbanization.
Science
According to a well-known principle, Maximin, we should rank outcomes according to the welfare of the worst off: The lower the welfare of the worst off, the worse the population.
Science
But the picture may be even worse where population growth is robust.
News & Media
For instance, a study of the National Health Service Corps (NHSC), a national financial-incentive programme that has operated in the United States since 1972 [ 77], found that the poorer an underserved area eligible to receive an NHSC physician and the worse its population health, the less likely it was to receive a physician through the programme [ 78].
Science
Expert writing Tips
Best practice
When discussing populations, be specific about what makes the population "worse". Instead of "worse population", consider using phrases like "population with poorer health outcomes" or "population in decline" for greater clarity.
Common error
Avoid using "worse population" without specifying the criteria for 'worse'. This phrase is vague. Provide context: is it about health, economic status, or access to resources?
Source & Trust
84%
Authority and reliability
2.8/5
Expert rating
Real-world application tested
Linguistic Context
The phrase "worse population" functions as a noun phrase where "worse" acts as a pre-modifying adjective. Ludwig AI indicates that the phrase itself can be improved for clarity and precision. Grammatically, it aims to describe a population's state relative to another or a standard.
Frequent in
Science
60%
News & Media
20%
Wiki
20%
Less common in
Formal & Business
0%
Encyclopedias
0%
Social Media
0%
Ludwig's WRAP-UP
The phrase "worse population" is an infrequent and often imprecise way to describe a group of people experiencing negative conditions. Ludwig AI highlights potential improvements in clarity and precision. While understandable, it's grammatically awkward and lacks specificity. Instead, consider more descriptive alternatives such as "population with poorer health outcomes", "declining population", or "vulnerable population". By providing context about what aspects are "worse", writers can communicate their message more effectively, as vague descriptions could lead to confusion.
More alternative expressions(10)
Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:
population with poorer health outcomes
Specifically refers to negative health indicators within the population.
less healthy population
A more direct way of stating that a population's health is in a worse state.
declining population
Focuses on the decreasing size of the population.
population in decline
Highlights the process of population reduction.
vulnerable population
Emphasizes the susceptibility of the population to harm or hardship.
disadvantaged population
Focuses on the socioeconomic challenges faced by the population.
underserved population
Highlights the lack of adequate services and resources for the population.
population in a deteriorated condition
Highlights the degradation or worsening of living conditions within the population.
population experiencing increased hardship
Emphasizes the growing challenges and difficulties faced by the population.
more deprived population
Highlights the lack of essential resources and opportunities for the population.
FAQs
What are some alternatives to the phrase "worse population"?
Depending on the context, you can use alternatives like "declining population", "vulnerable population", or "disadvantaged population".
How can I make my writing more specific when describing a population?
Instead of simply saying "worse population", specify what aspects are worse, such as health outcomes, economic conditions, or access to education. Use descriptive language to provide a clearer picture.
Is "worse population" grammatically correct?
While understandable, "worse population" can sound awkward. It's better to use more descriptive and precise language to convey your intended meaning, for instance "population with poorer health outcomes".
In what contexts might the phrase "worse population" be used?
The phrase might be used in discussions about public health, socioeconomics, or environmental factors impacting communities, but it should be clarified with further details to avoid ambiguity. For example: "a "population with poorer health outcomes"".
Editing plus AI, all in one place.
Stop switching between tools. Your AI writing partner for everything—polishing proposals, crafting emails, finding the right tone.
Table of contents
Usage summary
Human-verified examples
Expert writing tips
Linguistic context
Ludwig's wrap-up
Alternative expressions
FAQs
Source & Trust
84%
Authority and reliability
2.8/5
Expert rating
Real-world application tested